consider G0, H0 being strict Element of V;
set M = Morphs G0,H0;
set S = { (Morphs G,H) where G, H is strict Element of V : verum } ;
( ZERO G0,H0 is Element of Morphs G0,H0 & Morphs G0,H0 in { (Morphs G,H) where G, H is strict Element of V : verum } )
by Def27;
then reconsider T = union { (Morphs G,H) where G, H is strict Element of V : verum } as non empty set by TARSKI:def 4;
A1:
for x being set holds
( x in T iff ex G, H being strict Element of V st x is strict Morphism of G,H )
proof
let x be
set ;
( x in T iff ex G, H being strict Element of V st x is strict Morphism of G,H )
thus
(
x in T implies ex
G,
H being
strict Element of
V st
x is
strict Morphism of
G,
H )
( ex G, H being strict Element of V st x is strict Morphism of G,H implies x in T )proof
assume
x in T
;
ex G, H being strict Element of V st x is strict Morphism of G,H
then consider Y being
set such that A2:
x in Y
and A3:
Y in { (Morphs G,H) where G, H is strict Element of V : verum }
by TARSKI:def 4;
consider G,
H being
strict Element of
V such that A4:
Y = Morphs G,
H
by A3;
take
G
;
ex H being strict Element of V st x is strict Morphism of G,H
take
H
;
x is strict Morphism of G,H
thus
x is
strict Morphism of
G,
H
by A2, A4, Def27;
verum
end;
thus
( ex
G,
H being
strict Element of
V st
x is
strict Morphism of
G,
H implies
x in T )
verum
end;
then reconsider T9 = T as GroupMorphism_DOMAIN by Def23;
take
T9
; for x being set holds
( x in T9 iff ex G, H being strict Element of V st x is strict Morphism of G,H )
thus
for x being set holds
( x in T9 iff ex G, H being strict Element of V st x is strict Morphism of G,H )
by A1; verum