let A, a, b, c be set ; ( <*a,b,c*> in 3 -tuples_on A implies ( a in A & b in A & c in A ) )
A1:
<*a,b,c*> . 3 = c
by FINSEQ_1:62;
assume
<*a,b,c*> in 3 -tuples_on A
; ( a in A & b in A & c in A )
then A2:
ex a9, b9, c9 being set st
( a9 in A & b9 in A & c9 in A & <*a,b,c*> = <*a9,b9,c9*> )
by Th12;
( <*a,b,c*> . 1 = a & <*a,b,c*> . 2 = b )
by FINSEQ_1:62;
hence
( a in A & b in A & c in A )
by A2, A1, FINSEQ_1:62; verum