now
let x be set ; :: thesis: ( ( x in SepQuadruples VERUM implies x = [VERUM ,0 ,({}. bound_QC-variables ),(id bound_QC-variables )] ) & ( x = [VERUM ,0 ,({}. bound_QC-variables ),(id bound_QC-variables )] implies x in SepQuadruples VERUM ) )
thus ( x in SepQuadruples VERUM implies x = [VERUM ,0 ,({}. bound_QC-variables ),(id bound_QC-variables )] ) :: thesis: ( x = [VERUM ,0 ,({}. bound_QC-variables ),(id bound_QC-variables )] implies x in SepQuadruples VERUM )
proof
assume A1: x in SepQuadruples VERUM ; :: thesis: x = [VERUM ,0 ,({}. bound_QC-variables ),(id bound_QC-variables )]
then consider q being Element of CQC-WFF , k being Element of NAT , K being Finite_Subset of bound_QC-variables , f being Element of Funcs bound_QC-variables ,bound_QC-variables such that
A2: x = [q,k,K,f] by DOMAIN_1:31;
hence x = [VERUM ,0 ,({}. bound_QC-variables ),(id bound_QC-variables )] by A1, A2, A7, A5, A3, Th23, Th35; :: thesis: verum
end;
thus ( x = [VERUM ,0 ,({}. bound_QC-variables ),(id bound_QC-variables )] implies x in SepQuadruples VERUM ) by Th23, Th31; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence SepQuadruples VERUM = {[VERUM ,0 ,({}. bound_QC-variables ),(id bound_QC-variables )]} by TARSKI:def 1; :: thesis: verum