let n be Ordinal; for o being TermOrder of n st ( for a, b, c being bag of n st [a,b] in o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in o ) & o is_strongly_connected_in Bags n holds
Graded o is admissible
let o be TermOrder of n; ( ( for a, b, c being bag of n st [a,b] in o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in o ) & o is_strongly_connected_in Bags n implies Graded o is admissible )
assume that
A1:
for a, b, c being bag of n st [a,b] in o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in o
and
A2:
o is_strongly_connected_in Bags n
; Graded o is admissible
now let x,
y be
set ;
( x in Bags n & y in Bags n & not [x,y] in Graded o implies [b2,b1] in Graded o )assume that A3:
x in Bags n
and A4:
y in Bags n
;
( not [x,y] in Graded o implies [b2,b1] in Graded o )reconsider x9 =
x,
y9 =
y as
bag of
n by A3, A4;
assume A5:
not
[x,y] in Graded o
;
[b2,b1] in Graded othen A6:
TotDegree x9 >= TotDegree y9
by A1, Def9;
per cases
( TotDegree y9 < TotDegree x9 or TotDegree y9 = TotDegree x9 )
by A6, XXREAL_0:1;
suppose A7:
TotDegree y9 = TotDegree x9
;
[b2,b1] in Graded othen
not
[x,y] in o
by A1, A5, Def9;
then
[y,x] in o
by A2, A3, A4, RELAT_2:def 7;
hence
[y,x] in Graded o
by A1, A7, Def9;
verum end; end; end;
hence
Graded o is_strongly_connected_in Bags n
by RELAT_2:def 7; BAGORDER:def 7 ( ( for a being bag of n holds [(EmptyBag n),a] in Graded o ) & ( for a, b, c being bag of n st [a,b] in Graded o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in Graded o ) )
hence
for a being bag of n holds [(EmptyBag n),a] in Graded o
; for a, b, c being bag of n st [a,b] in Graded o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in Graded o
hence
for a, b, c being bag of n st [a,b] in Graded o holds
[(a + c),(b + c)] in Graded o
; verum