let A be preIfWhileAlgebra; :: thesis: for C, I, J being Element of A
for S being non empty set
for T being Subset of S
for s being Element of S
for f being ExecutionFunction of A,S,T st A is free & [s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f holds
( [s,C] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f & ( f . s,C in T implies [(f . s,C),I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) & ( f . s,C nin T implies [(f . s,C),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) )

let C, I, J be Element of A; :: thesis: for S being non empty set
for T being Subset of S
for s being Element of S
for f being ExecutionFunction of A,S,T st A is free & [s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f holds
( [s,C] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f & ( f . s,C in T implies [(f . s,C),I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) & ( f . s,C nin T implies [(f . s,C),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) )

let S be non empty set ; :: thesis: for T being Subset of S
for s being Element of S
for f being ExecutionFunction of A,S,T st A is free & [s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f holds
( [s,C] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f & ( f . s,C in T implies [(f . s,C),I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) & ( f . s,C nin T implies [(f . s,C),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) )

let T be Subset of S; :: thesis: for s being Element of S
for f being ExecutionFunction of A,S,T st A is free & [s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f holds
( [s,C] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f & ( f . s,C in T implies [(f . s,C),I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) & ( f . s,C nin T implies [(f . s,C),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) )

let s be Element of S; :: thesis: for f being ExecutionFunction of A,S,T st A is free & [s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f holds
( [s,C] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f & ( f . s,C in T implies [(f . s,C),I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) & ( f . s,C nin T implies [(f . s,C),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) )

let f be ExecutionFunction of A,S,T; :: thesis: ( A is free & [s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f implies ( [s,C] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f & ( f . s,C in T implies [(f . s,C),I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) & ( f . s,C nin T implies [(f . s,C),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) ) )
set TP = TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f;
set rr = s;
set IJ = if-then-else C,I,J;
assume that
A1: A is free and
A2: [s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ; :: thesis: ( [s,C] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f & ( f . s,C in T implies [(f . s,C),I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) & ( f . s,C nin T implies [(f . s,C),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) )
reconsider P = (TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f) \ {[s,(if-then-else C,I,J)]} as Subset of [:S,the carrier of A:] ;
A3: [:S,(ElementaryInstructions A):] c= P
proof end;
A7: [:S,{(EmptyIns A)}:] c= P
proof end;
A11: now
let s be Element of S; :: thesis: for C, I, J being Element of A holds
( ( [s,I] in P & [(f . s,I),J] in P implies [s,(I \; J)] in P ) & ( [s,C] in P & ex r being non empty FinSequence of S st
( r . 1 = f . s,C & r . (len r) nin T & ( for i being Nat st 1 <= i & i < len r holds
( r . i in T & [(r . i),(I \; C)] in P & r . (i + 1) = f . (r . i),(I \; C) ) ) ) implies [s,(while C,I)] in P ) )

let C, I, J be Element of A; :: thesis: ( ( [s,I] in P & [(f . s,I),J] in P implies [s,(I \; J)] in P ) & ( [s,C] in P & ex r being non empty FinSequence of S st
( r . 1 = f . s,C & r . (len r) nin T & ( for i being Nat st 1 <= i & i < len r holds
( r . i in T & [(r . i),(I \; C)] in P & r . (i + 1) = f . (r . i),(I \; C) ) ) ) implies [s,(while C,I)] in P ) )

hereby :: thesis: ( [s,C] in P & ex r being non empty FinSequence of S st
( r . 1 = f . s,C & r . (len r) nin T & ( for i being Nat st 1 <= i & i < len r holds
( r . i in T & [(r . i),(I \; C)] in P & r . (i + 1) = f . (r . i),(I \; C) ) ) ) implies [s,(while C,I)] in P )
assume that
A12: [s,I] in P and
A13: [(f . s,I),J] in P ; :: thesis: [s,(I \; J)] in P
A14: [s,I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A12, ZFMISC_1:64;
A15: [(f . s,I),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A13, ZFMISC_1:64;
A16: if-then-else C,I,J <> I \; J by A1, Th73;
A17: [s,(I \; J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A14, A15, Def35;
[s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] <> [s,(I \; J)] by A16, ZFMISC_1:33;
hence [s,(I \; J)] in P by A17, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
assume A18: [s,C] in P ; :: thesis: ( ex r being non empty FinSequence of S st
( r . 1 = f . s,C & r . (len r) nin T & ( for i being Nat st 1 <= i & i < len r holds
( r . i in T & [(r . i),(I \; C)] in P & r . (i + 1) = f . (r . i),(I \; C) ) ) ) implies [s,(while C,I)] in P )

given r being non empty FinSequence of S such that A19: r . 1 = f . s,C and
A20: r . (len r) nin T and
A21: for i being Nat st 1 <= i & i < len r holds
( r . i in T & [(r . i),(I \; C)] in P & r . (i + 1) = f . (r . i),(I \; C) ) ; :: thesis: [s,(while C,I)] in P
A22: now
let i be Nat; :: thesis: ( 1 <= i & i < len r implies ( r . i in T & [(r . i),(I \; C)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f & r . (i + 1) = f . (r . i),(I \; C) ) )
assume that
A23: 1 <= i and
A24: i < len r ; :: thesis: ( r . i in T & [(r . i),(I \; C)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f & r . (i + 1) = f . (r . i),(I \; C) )
[(r . i),(I \; C)] in P by A21, A23, A24;
hence ( r . i in T & [(r . i),(I \; C)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f & r . (i + 1) = f . (r . i),(I \; C) ) by A21, A23, A24, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
A25: [s,C] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A18, ZFMISC_1:64;
A26: while C,I <> if-then-else C,I,J by A1, Th74;
A27: [s,(while C,I)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A19, A20, A22, A25, Def35;
[s,(while C,I)] <> [s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] by A26, ZFMISC_1:33;
hence [s,(while C,I)] in P by A27, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
hereby :: thesis: ( ( f . s,C in T implies [(f . s,C),I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) & ( f . s,C nin T implies [(f . s,C),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) )
assume A28: [s,C] nin TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ; :: thesis: contradiction
A29: now
let s be Element of S; :: thesis: for C9, I, J being Element of A st [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),I] in P & f . s,C9 in T holds
[s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] in P

let C9, I, J be Element of A; :: thesis: ( [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),I] in P & f . s,C9 in T implies [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] in P )
assume that
A30: [s,C9] in P and
A31: [(f . s,C9),I] in P and
A32: f . s,C9 in T ; :: thesis: [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] in P
A33: [s,C9] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A30, ZFMISC_1:64;
A34: [(f . s,C9),I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A31, ZFMISC_1:64;
A35: ( if-then-else C,I,J <> if-then-else C9,I,J or s <> s ) by A1, A28, A33, Th74;
A36: [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A32, A33, A34, Def35;
[s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] <> [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] by A35, ZFMISC_1:33;
hence [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] in P by A36, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
now
let s be Element of S; :: thesis: for C9, I, J being Element of A st [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),J] in P & f . s,C9 nin T holds
[s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] in P

let C9, I, J be Element of A; :: thesis: ( [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),J] in P & f . s,C9 nin T implies [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] in P )
assume that
A37: [s,C9] in P and
A38: [(f . s,C9),J] in P and
A39: f . s,C9 nin T ; :: thesis: [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] in P
A40: [s,C9] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A37, ZFMISC_1:64;
A41: [(f . s,C9),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A38, ZFMISC_1:64;
A42: ( if-then-else C,I,J <> if-then-else C9,I,J or s <> s ) by A1, A28, A40, Th74;
A43: [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A39, A40, A41, Def35;
[s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] <> [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] by A42, ZFMISC_1:33;
hence [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J)] in P by A43, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
then TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f c= P by A3, A7, A11, A29, Def35;
hence contradiction by A2, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
thus ( f . s,C in T implies [(f . s,C),I] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ) :: thesis: ( f . s,C nin T implies [(f . s,C),J] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f )
proof
assume that
A44: f . s,C in T and
A45: [(f . s,C),I] nin TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ; :: thesis: contradiction
A46: now
let s be Element of S; :: thesis: for C9, I9, J being Element of A st [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),I9] in P & f . s,C9 in T holds
[s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] in P

let C9, I9, J be Element of A; :: thesis: ( [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),I9] in P & f . s,C9 in T implies [s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] in P )
assume that
A47: [s,C9] in P and
A48: [(f . s,C9),I9] in P and
A49: f . s,C9 in T ; :: thesis: [s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] in P
A50: [s,C9] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A47, ZFMISC_1:64;
A51: [(f . s,C9),I9] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A48, ZFMISC_1:64;
( f . s,C9 <> f . s,C or I <> I9 ) by A45, A48, ZFMISC_1:64;
then A52: ( if-then-else C,I,J <> if-then-else C9,I9,J or s <> s ) by A1, Th74;
A53: [s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A49, A50, A51, Def35;
[s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] <> [s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] by A52, ZFMISC_1:33;
hence [s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] in P by A53, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
now
let s be Element of S; :: thesis: for C9, I, J9 being Element of A st [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),J9] in P & f . s,C9 nin T holds
[s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] in P

let C9, I, J9 be Element of A; :: thesis: ( [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),J9] in P & f . s,C9 nin T implies [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] in P )
assume that
A54: [s,C9] in P and
A55: [(f . s,C9),J9] in P and
A56: f . s,C9 nin T ; :: thesis: [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] in P
A57: [s,C9] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A54, ZFMISC_1:64;
A58: [(f . s,C9),J9] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A55, ZFMISC_1:64;
A59: ( if-then-else C,I,J <> if-then-else C9,I,J9 or s <> s ) by A1, A44, A56, Th74;
A60: [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A56, A57, A58, Def35;
[s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] <> [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] by A59, ZFMISC_1:33;
hence [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] in P by A60, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
then TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f c= P by A3, A7, A11, A46, Def35;
hence contradiction by A2, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
assume that
A61: f . s,C nin T and
A62: [(f . s,C),J] nin TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f ; :: thesis: contradiction
A63: now
let s be Element of S; :: thesis: for C9, I9, J being Element of A st [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),I9] in P & f . s,C9 in T holds
[s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] in P

let C9, I9, J be Element of A; :: thesis: ( [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),I9] in P & f . s,C9 in T implies [s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] in P )
assume that
A64: [s,C9] in P and
A65: [(f . s,C9),I9] in P and
A66: f . s,C9 in T ; :: thesis: [s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] in P
A67: [s,C9] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A64, ZFMISC_1:64;
A68: [(f . s,C9),I9] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A65, ZFMISC_1:64;
A69: ( if-then-else C,I,J <> if-then-else C9,I9,J or s <> s ) by A1, A61, A66, Th74;
A70: [s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A66, A67, A68, Def35;
[s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] <> [s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] by A69, ZFMISC_1:33;
hence [s,(if-then-else C9,I9,J)] in P by A70, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
now
let s be Element of S; :: thesis: for C9, I, J9 being Element of A st [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),J9] in P & f . s,C9 nin T holds
[s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] in P

let C9, I, J9 be Element of A; :: thesis: ( [s,C9] in P & [(f . s,C9),J9] in P & f . s,C9 nin T implies [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] in P )
assume that
A71: [s,C9] in P and
A72: [(f . s,C9),J9] in P and
A73: f . s,C9 nin T ; :: thesis: [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] in P
A74: [s,C9] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A71, ZFMISC_1:64;
A75: [(f . s,C9),J9] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A72, ZFMISC_1:64;
( f . s,C9 <> f . s,C or J <> J9 ) by A62, A72, ZFMISC_1:64;
then A76: ( if-then-else C,I,J <> if-then-else C9,I,J9 or s <> s ) by A1, Th74;
A77: [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] in TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f by A73, A74, A75, Def35;
[s,(if-then-else C,I,J)] <> [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] by A76, ZFMISC_1:33;
hence [s,(if-then-else C9,I,J9)] in P by A77, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum
end;
then TerminatingPrograms A,S,T,f c= P by A3, A7, A11, A63, Def35;
hence contradiction by A2, ZFMISC_1:64; :: thesis: verum