let it1, it2 be Element of NAT ; ( CurInstr p,(Comput p,s,it1) = halt S & ( for k being Element of NAT st CurInstr p,(Comput p,s,k) = halt S holds
it1 <= k ) & CurInstr p,(Comput p,s,it2) = halt S & ( for k being Element of NAT st CurInstr p,(Comput p,s,k) = halt S holds
it2 <= k ) implies it1 = it2 )
assume A4:
( CurInstr p,(Comput p,s,it1) = halt S & ( for k being Element of NAT st CurInstr p,(Comput p,s,k) = halt S holds
it1 <= k ) & CurInstr p,(Comput p,s,it2) = halt S & ( for k being Element of NAT st CurInstr p,(Comput p,s,k) = halt S holds
it2 <= k ) & not it1 = it2 )
; contradiction
then
( it1 <= it2 & it2 <= it1 )
;
hence
contradiction
by A4, XXREAL_0:1; verum