let R, S, T be Relation; (R \/ S) * T = (R * T) \/ (S * T)
thus
(R \/ S) * T = (R * T) \/ (S * T)
verumproof
let x be
set ;
RELAT_1:def 2 for b1 being set holds
( ( not [x,b1] in (R \/ S) * T or [x,b1] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) ) & ( not [x,b1] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) or [x,b1] in (R \/ S) * T ) )let y be
set ;
( ( not [x,y] in (R \/ S) * T or [x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) ) & ( not [x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) or [x,y] in (R \/ S) * T ) )
thus
(
[x,y] in (R \/ S) * T implies
[x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) )
( not [x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) or [x,y] in (R \/ S) * T )proof
assume
[x,y] in (R \/ S) * T
;
[x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T)
then consider z being
set such that A1:
(
[x,z] in R \/ S &
[z,y] in T )
by RELAT_1:def 8;
( (
[x,z] in R &
[z,y] in T ) or (
[x,z] in S &
[z,y] in T ) )
by A1, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
(
[x,y] in R * T or
[x,y] in S * T )
by RELAT_1:def 8;
hence
[x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T)
by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
verum
end;
thus
(
[x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) implies
[x,y] in (R \/ S) * T )
verumproof
A2:
(
[x,y] in S * T &
[x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) implies
[x,y] in (R \/ S) * T )
proof
assume
[x,y] in S * T
;
( not [x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) or [x,y] in (R \/ S) * T )
then consider z being
set such that A3:
[x,z] in S
and A4:
[z,y] in T
by RELAT_1:def 8;
[x,z] in R \/ S
by A3, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence
( not
[x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) or
[x,y] in (R \/ S) * T )
by A4, RELAT_1:def 8;
verum
end;
A5:
(
[x,y] in R * T &
[x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) implies
[x,y] in (R \/ S) * T )
proof
assume
[x,y] in R * T
;
( not [x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) or [x,y] in (R \/ S) * T )
then consider z being
set such that A6:
[x,z] in R
and A7:
[z,y] in T
by RELAT_1:def 8;
[x,z] in R \/ S
by A6, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence
( not
[x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T) or
[x,y] in (R \/ S) * T )
by A7, RELAT_1:def 8;
verum
end;
assume
[x,y] in (R * T) \/ (S * T)
;
[x,y] in (R \/ S) * T
hence
[x,y] in (R \/ S) * T
by A5, A2, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
verum
end;
end;