let p be non NAT -defined autonomic FinPartState of ; :: thesis: for s1, s2 being State of SCM+FSA st p c= s1 & p c= s2 holds
for i being Element of NAT
for da being Int-Location
for loc being Element of NAT st CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) = da =0_goto loc & loc <> succ (IC (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)) holds
( (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) . da = 0 iff (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) . da = 0 )

let s1, s2 be State of SCM+FSA ; :: thesis: ( p c= s1 & p c= s2 implies for i being Element of NAT
for da being Int-Location
for loc being Element of NAT st CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) = da =0_goto loc & loc <> succ (IC (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)) holds
( (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) . da = 0 iff (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) . da = 0 ) )

assume A1: ( p c= s1 & p c= s2 ) ; :: thesis: for i being Element of NAT
for da being Int-Location
for loc being Element of NAT st CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) = da =0_goto loc & loc <> succ (IC (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)) holds
( (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) . da = 0 iff (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) . da = 0 )

let i be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: for da being Int-Location
for loc being Element of NAT st CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) = da =0_goto loc & loc <> succ (IC (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)) holds
( (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) . da = 0 iff (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) . da = 0 )

let da be Int-Location ; :: thesis: for loc being Element of NAT st CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) = da =0_goto loc & loc <> succ (IC (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)) holds
( (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) . da = 0 iff (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) . da = 0 )

let loc be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: ( CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) = da =0_goto loc & loc <> succ (IC (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)) implies ( (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) . da = 0 iff (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) . da = 0 ) )
set I = CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i);
set Cs1i = Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i;
set Cs2i = Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i;
set Cs1i1 = Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,(i + 1);
set Cs2i1 = Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,(i + 1);
T: ProgramPart s1 = ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) by AMI_1:144;
A2: Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,(i + 1) = Following (ProgramPart s1),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) by AMI_1:14
.= Exec (CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) by T ;
T: ProgramPart s2 = ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) by AMI_1:144;
A3: Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,(i + 1) = Following (ProgramPart s2),(Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) by AMI_1:14
.= Exec (CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) by T ;
A4: ( ((Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,(i + 1)) | (dom p)) . (IC SCM+FSA ) = (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,(i + 1)) . (IC SCM+FSA ) & ((Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,(i + 1)) | (dom p)) . (IC SCM+FSA ) = (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,(i + 1)) . (IC SCM+FSA ) ) by Th15, FUNCT_1:72;
assume that
A5: CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) = da =0_goto loc and
A6: loc <> succ (IC (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)) ; :: thesis: ( (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) . da = 0 iff (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) . da = 0 )
A7: CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) = CurInstr (ProgramPart (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i)),(Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) by A1, Th18;
A8: now
assume ( (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) . da = 0 & (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) . da <> 0 ) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then ( (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,(i + 1)) . (IC SCM+FSA ) = loc & (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,(i + 1)) . (IC SCM+FSA ) = succ (IC (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i)) ) by A7, A2, A3, A5, SCMFSA_2:96;
hence contradiction by A1, A4, A6, AMI_1:def 25; :: thesis: verum
end;
A9: (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,(i + 1)) | (dom p) = (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,(i + 1)) | (dom p) by A1, AMI_1:def 25;
now
assume ( (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) . da = 0 & (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) . da <> 0 ) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then ( (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,(i + 1)) . (IC SCM+FSA ) = loc & (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,(i + 1)) . (IC SCM+FSA ) = succ (IC (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i)) ) by A7, A2, A3, A5, SCMFSA_2:96;
hence contradiction by A1, A4, A9, A6, Th18; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence ( (Comput (ProgramPart s1),s1,i) . da = 0 iff (Comput (ProgramPart s2),s2,i) . da = 0 ) by A8; :: thesis: verum