set R = pcs-general-power P,D;
set IR = the InternalRel of (pcs-general-power P,D);
let x, y, z be set ; :: according to RELAT_2:def 8,ORDERS_2:def 5 :: thesis: ( not x in the carrier of (pcs-general-power P,D) or not y in the carrier of (pcs-general-power P,D) or not z in the carrier of (pcs-general-power P,D) or not [^,^] in the InternalRel of (pcs-general-power P,D) or not [^,^] in the InternalRel of (pcs-general-power P,D) or [^,^] in the InternalRel of (pcs-general-power P,D) )
assume that
A1: x in the carrier of (pcs-general-power P,D) and
y in the carrier of (pcs-general-power P,D) and
A2: z in the carrier of (pcs-general-power P,D) and
A3: [x,y] in the InternalRel of (pcs-general-power P,D) and
A4: [y,z] in the InternalRel of (pcs-general-power P,D) ; :: thesis: [^,^] in the InternalRel of (pcs-general-power P,D)
for a being set st a in x holds
ex b being set st
( b in z & [a,b] in the InternalRel of P )
proof
let a be set ; :: thesis: ( a in x implies ex b being set st
( b in z & [a,b] in the InternalRel of P ) )

assume a in x ; :: thesis: ex b being set st
( b in z & [a,b] in the InternalRel of P )

then consider b being set such that
A5: b in y and
A6: [a,b] in the InternalRel of P by A3, Def45;
consider c being set such that
A7: c in z and
A8: [b,c] in the InternalRel of P by A4, A5, Def45;
take c ; :: thesis: ( c in z & [a,c] in the InternalRel of P )
thus c in z by A7; :: thesis: [a,c] in the InternalRel of P
A9: the InternalRel of P is_transitive_in the carrier of P by ORDERS_2:def 5;
A10: a in the carrier of P by A6, ZFMISC_1:106;
A11: b in the carrier of P by A6, ZFMISC_1:106;
c in the carrier of P by A8, ZFMISC_1:106;
hence [a,c] in the InternalRel of P by A6, A8, A9, A10, A11, RELAT_2:def 8; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence [^,^] in the InternalRel of (pcs-general-power P,D) by A1, A2, Def45; :: thesis: verum