let n1, n2, n3, n4 be Element of NAT ; :: thesis: for S being Gene-Set
for p1, p2 being Individual of S holds
( ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n4 ) & ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n3 ) & ( n1 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n2 ) & ( n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n1 ) )

let S be Gene-Set; :: thesis: for p1, p2 being Individual of S holds
( ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n4 ) & ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n3 ) & ( n1 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n2 ) & ( n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n1 ) )

let p1, p2 be Individual of S; :: thesis: ( ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n4 ) & ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n3 ) & ( n1 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n2 ) & ( n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n1 ) )
A1: ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n4 )
proof
assume that
A2: ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 ) and
A3: n3 >= len p1 ; :: thesis: crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n4
crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n3,n4 by A2, Th34;
hence crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n4 by A3, Th9; :: thesis: verum
end;
A4: ( n1 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n2 )
proof
assume that
A5: ( n1 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 ) and
A6: n4 >= len p1 ; :: thesis: crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n2
crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n2,n4 by A5, Th34
.= crossover p1,p2,n4,n2 by Th13 ;
hence crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n2 by A6, Th9; :: thesis: verum
end;
A7: ( n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n1 )
proof
assume that
A8: ( n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 ) and
A9: n4 >= len p1 ; :: thesis: crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n1
crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n1,n4 by A8, Th34
.= crossover p1,p2,n4,n1 by Th13 ;
hence crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n1 by A9, Th9; :: thesis: verum
end;
( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n3 )
proof
assume that
A10: ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 ) and
A11: n4 >= len p1 ; :: thesis: crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n3
crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n3,n4 by A10, Th34
.= crossover p1,p2,n4,n3 by Th13 ;
hence crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n3 by A11, Th9; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence ( ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n4 ) & ( n1 >= len p1 & n2 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n3 ) & ( n1 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n2 ) & ( n2 >= len p1 & n3 >= len p1 & n4 >= len p1 implies crossover p1,p2,n1,n2,n3,n4 = crossover p1,p2,n1 ) ) by A1, A4, A7; :: thesis: verum