let M be Pnet; :: thesis: ( (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~ = (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M & (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~ = (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M )
set R = the Flow of M;
set X = the Places of M;
set Y = the Transitions of M;
for x, y being set st [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~ holds
[x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M
proof
let x, y be set ; :: thesis: ( [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~ implies [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M )
assume [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~ ; :: thesis: [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M
then A1: [y,x] in the Flow of M | the Places of M by RELAT_1:def 7;
then A2: [y,x] in the Flow of M by RELAT_1:def 11;
A3: y in the Places of M by A1, RELAT_1:def 11;
A4: [x,y] in the Flow of M ~ by A2, RELAT_1:def 7;
x in the Transitions of M by A2, A3, Th11;
hence [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M by A4, RELAT_1:def 11; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A5: (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~ c= (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M by RELAT_1:def 3;
for x, y being set st [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M holds
[x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~
proof
let x, y be set ; :: thesis: ( [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M implies [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~ )
assume A6: [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M ; :: thesis: [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~
then [x,y] in the Flow of M ~ by RELAT_1:def 11;
then A7: [y,x] in the Flow of M by RELAT_1:def 7;
x in the Transitions of M by A6, RELAT_1:def 11;
then y in the Places of M by A7, Th11;
then [y,x] in the Flow of M | the Places of M by A7, RELAT_1:def 11;
hence [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~ by RELAT_1:def 7; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A8: (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M c= (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~ by RELAT_1:def 3;
for x, y being set st [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~ holds
[x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M
proof
let x, y be set ; :: thesis: ( [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~ implies [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M )
assume [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~ ; :: thesis: [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M
then A9: [y,x] in the Flow of M | the Transitions of M by RELAT_1:def 7;
then A10: [y,x] in the Flow of M by RELAT_1:def 11;
A11: y in the Transitions of M by A9, RELAT_1:def 11;
A12: [x,y] in the Flow of M ~ by A10, RELAT_1:def 7;
x in the Places of M by A10, A11, Th11;
hence [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M by A12, RELAT_1:def 11; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A13: (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~ c= (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M by RELAT_1:def 3;
for x, y being set st [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M holds
[x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~
proof
let x, y be set ; :: thesis: ( [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M implies [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~ )
assume A14: [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M ; :: thesis: [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~
then [x,y] in the Flow of M ~ by RELAT_1:def 11;
then A15: [y,x] in the Flow of M by RELAT_1:def 7;
x in the Places of M by A14, RELAT_1:def 11;
then y in the Transitions of M by A15, Th11;
then [y,x] in the Flow of M | the Transitions of M by A15, RELAT_1:def 11;
hence [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~ by RELAT_1:def 7; :: thesis: verum
end;
then (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M c= (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~ by RELAT_1:def 3;
hence ( (the Flow of M | the Places of M) ~ = (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M & (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) ~ = (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M ) by A5, A8, A13, XBOOLE_0:def 10; :: thesis: verum