let M be Pnet; :: thesis: ( (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M misses id (Elements M) & the Flow of M | the Transitions of M misses id (Elements M) & (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M misses id (Elements M) & the Flow of M | the Places of M misses id (Elements M) )
set T = id (Elements M);
thus (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M misses id (Elements M) :: thesis: ( the Flow of M | the Transitions of M misses id (Elements M) & (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M misses id (Elements M) & the Flow of M | the Places of M misses id (Elements M) )
proof
set R = (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M;
for x, y being set holds not [x,y] in ((the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M) /\ (id (Elements M))
proof
let x, y be set ; :: thesis: not [x,y] in ((the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M) /\ (id (Elements M))
assume A1: [x,y] in ((the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M) /\ (id (Elements M)) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A2: [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A3: [x,y] in id (Elements M) by A1, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A4: [x,y] in the Flow of M ~ by A2, RELAT_1:def 11;
A5: x in the Transitions of M by A2, RELAT_1:def 11;
[y,x] in the Flow of M by A4, RELAT_1:def 7;
then x <> y by A5, Th11;
hence contradiction by A3, RELAT_1:def 10; :: thesis: verum
end;
then ((the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M) /\ (id (Elements M)) = {} by RELAT_1:56;
hence (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Transitions of M misses id (Elements M) by XBOOLE_0:def 7; :: thesis: verum
end;
thus the Flow of M | the Transitions of M misses id (Elements M) :: thesis: ( (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M misses id (Elements M) & the Flow of M | the Places of M misses id (Elements M) )
proof
set R = the Flow of M | the Transitions of M;
for x, y being set holds not [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) /\ (id (Elements M))
proof
let x, y be set ; :: thesis: not [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) /\ (id (Elements M))
assume A6: [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) /\ (id (Elements M)) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A7: [x,y] in the Flow of M | the Transitions of M by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A8: [x,y] in id (Elements M) by A6, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A9: x in the Transitions of M by A7, RELAT_1:def 11;
[x,y] in the Flow of M by A7, RELAT_1:def 11;
then x <> y by A9, Th11;
hence contradiction by A8, RELAT_1:def 10; :: thesis: verum
end;
then (the Flow of M | the Transitions of M) /\ (id (Elements M)) = {} by RELAT_1:56;
hence the Flow of M | the Transitions of M misses id (Elements M) by XBOOLE_0:def 7; :: thesis: verum
end;
thus (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M misses id (Elements M) :: thesis: the Flow of M | the Places of M misses id (Elements M)
proof
set R = (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M;
for x, y being set holds not [x,y] in ((the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M) /\ (id (Elements M))
proof
let x, y be set ; :: thesis: not [x,y] in ((the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M) /\ (id (Elements M))
assume A10: [x,y] in ((the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M) /\ (id (Elements M)) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A11: [x,y] in (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A12: [x,y] in id (Elements M) by A10, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A13: [x,y] in the Flow of M ~ by A11, RELAT_1:def 11;
A14: x in the Places of M by A11, RELAT_1:def 11;
[y,x] in the Flow of M by A13, RELAT_1:def 7;
then x <> y by A14, Th11;
hence contradiction by A12, RELAT_1:def 10; :: thesis: verum
end;
then ((the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M) /\ (id (Elements M)) = {} by RELAT_1:56;
hence (the Flow of M ~ ) | the Places of M misses id (Elements M) by XBOOLE_0:def 7; :: thesis: verum
end;
set R = the Flow of M | the Places of M;
for x, y being set holds not [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Places of M) /\ (id (Elements M))
proof
let x, y be set ; :: thesis: not [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Places of M) /\ (id (Elements M))
assume A15: [x,y] in (the Flow of M | the Places of M) /\ (id (Elements M)) ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A16: [x,y] in the Flow of M | the Places of M by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A17: [x,y] in id (Elements M) by A15, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A18: x in the Places of M by A16, RELAT_1:def 11;
[x,y] in the Flow of M by A16, RELAT_1:def 11;
then x <> y by A18, Th11;
hence contradiction by A17, RELAT_1:def 10; :: thesis: verum
end;
then (the Flow of M | the Places of M) /\ (id (Elements M)) = {} by RELAT_1:56;
hence the Flow of M | the Places of M misses id (Elements M) by XBOOLE_0:def 7; :: thesis: verum