let Y, X, Z be set ; :: thesis: for A being Ordinal st A <> {} & A is limit_ordinal & Y in Tarski-Class X,A & ( Z c= Y or Z = bool Y ) holds
Z in Tarski-Class X,A

let A be Ordinal; :: thesis: ( A <> {} & A is limit_ordinal & Y in Tarski-Class X,A & ( Z c= Y or Z = bool Y ) implies Z in Tarski-Class X,A )
assume that
A1: A <> {} and
A2: A is limit_ordinal and
A3: Y in Tarski-Class X,A ; :: thesis: ( ( not Z c= Y & not Z = bool Y ) or Z in Tarski-Class X,A )
consider B being Ordinal such that
A4: B in A and
A5: Y in Tarski-Class X,B by A1, A2, A3, Th16;
A6: bool Y in Tarski-Class X,(succ B) by A5, Th13;
A7: ( Z c= Y implies Z in Tarski-Class X,(succ B) ) by A5, Th13;
A8: succ B in A by A2, A4, ORDINAL1:41;
assume A9: ( Z c= Y or Z = bool Y ) ; :: thesis: Z in Tarski-Class X,A
thus Z in Tarski-Class X,A by A2, A6, A7, A8, A9, Th16; :: thesis: verum