let a, b be Aleph; :: thesis: ( a is limit_cardinal & b in cf a implies exp a,b = Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) )
assume that
A1: a is limit_cardinal and
A2: b in cf a ; :: thesis: exp a,b = Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)
deffunc H1( Ordinal) -> set = Funcs b,$1;
consider L being T-Sequence such that
A3: ( dom L = a & ( for A being Ordinal st A in a holds
L . A = H1(A) ) ) from ORDINAL2:sch 2();
A4: now
let x be set ; :: thesis: ( x in a implies (Card L) . x c= (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) . x )
A5: card (Union (b -powerfunc_of a)) c= Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) by CARD_3:55;
assume A6: x in a ; :: thesis: (Card L) . x c= (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) . x
then reconsider x9 = x as Ordinal ;
set m = card x9;
A7: card x9 in a by A6, CARD_1:24, ORDINAL1:22;
then card x9 in dom (b -powerfunc_of a) by Def3;
then A8: (b -powerfunc_of a) . (card x) in rng (b -powerfunc_of a) by FUNCT_1:def 5;
x9, card x9 are_equipotent by CARD_1:def 5;
then A9: card (Funcs b,x9) = card (Funcs b,(card x9)) by FUNCT_5:67;
( L . x = Funcs b,x9 & (Card L) . x = card (L . x) ) by A3, A6, CARD_3:def 2;
then A10: (Card L) . x = exp (card x9),b by A9, CARD_2:def 3;
(b -powerfunc_of a) . (card x) = exp (card x),b by A7, Def3;
then card (exp (card x),b) c= card (Union (b -powerfunc_of a)) by A8, CARD_1:27, ZFMISC_1:92;
then A11: card (exp (card x),b) c= Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) by A5, XBOOLE_1:1;
card (exp (card x),b) = exp (card x),b by CARD_1:def 5;
hence (Card L) . x c= (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) . x by A6, A10, A11, FUNCOP_1:13; :: thesis: verum
end;
( dom (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) = a & dom (Card L) = dom L ) by CARD_3:def 2, FUNCOP_1:19;
then A12: Sum (Card L) c= Sum (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) by A3, A4, CARD_3:43;
a c= Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)
proof end;
then A20: a *` (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)) = Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) by Th27;
Funcs b,a c= Union L
proof
let x be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in Funcs b,a or x in Union L )
assume x in Funcs b,a ; :: thesis: x in Union L
then consider f being Function such that
A21: x = f and
A22: dom f = b and
A23: rng f c= a by FUNCT_2:def 2;
reconsider f = f as T-Sequence by A22, ORDINAL1:def 7;
reconsider f = f as Ordinal-Sequence by A23, ORDINAL2:def 8;
rng f c= sup f by ORDINAL2:67;
then A24: x in Funcs b,(sup f) by A21, A22, FUNCT_2:def 2;
sup f in a by A2, A22, A23, Th39;
then A25: L . (sup f) in rng L by A3, FUNCT_1:def 5;
L . (sup f) = Funcs b,(sup f) by A2, A3, A22, A23, Th39;
hence x in Union L by A24, A25, TARSKI:def 4; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A26: card (Funcs b,a) c= card (Union L) by CARD_1:27;
card (Union L) c= Sum (Card L) by CARD_3:54;
then card (Funcs b,a) c= Sum (Card L) by A26, XBOOLE_1:1;
then A27: exp a,b c= Sum (Card L) by CARD_2:def 3;
A28: Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) c= exp a,b by Th45;
Sum (a --> (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a))) = a *` (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)) by CARD_3:52;
then exp a,b c= a *` (Sum (b -powerfunc_of a)) by A27, A12, XBOOLE_1:1;
hence exp a,b = Sum (b -powerfunc_of a) by A28, A20, XBOOLE_0:def 10; :: thesis: verum