let M be multMagma ; for R being Equivalence_Relation of M holds
( R is compatible iff for v, v9, w, w9 being Element of M st Class R,v = Class R,v9 & Class R,w = Class R,w9 holds
Class R,(v * w) = Class R,(v9 * w9) )
let R be Equivalence_Relation of M; ( R is compatible iff for v, v9, w, w9 being Element of M st Class R,v = Class R,v9 & Class R,w = Class R,w9 holds
Class R,(v * w) = Class R,(v9 * w9) )
hereby ( ( for v, v9, w, w9 being Element of M st Class R,v = Class R,v9 & Class R,w = Class R,w9 holds
Class R,(v * w) = Class R,(v9 * w9) ) implies R is compatible )
assume A1:
R is
compatible
;
for v, v9, w, w9 being Element of M st Class R,v = Class R,v9 & Class R,w = Class R,w9 holds
Class R,(b5 * b7) = Class R,(b6 * b8)let v,
v9,
w,
w9 be
Element of
M;
( Class R,v = Class R,v9 & Class R,w = Class R,w9 implies Class R,(b1 * b3) = Class R,(b2 * b4) )assume A2:
(
Class R,
v = Class R,
v9 &
Class R,
w = Class R,
w9 )
;
Class R,(b1 * b3) = Class R,(b2 * b4)
end;
assume A4:
for v, v9, w, w9 being Element of M st Class R,v = Class R,v9 & Class R,w = Class R,w9 holds
Class R,(v * w) = Class R,(v9 * w9)
; R is compatible
for v, v9, w, w9 being Element of M st v in Class R,v9 & w in Class R,w9 holds
v * w in Class R,(v9 * w9)
hence
R is compatible
by Def4; verum