let IIG be non empty finite non void Circuit-like monotonic ManySortedSign ; for SCS being non-empty Circuit of non-empty
for InpFs being InputFuncs of st commute InpFs is constant & not InputVertices IIG is empty holds
for s being State of
for n being Element of NAT st n = depth SCS holds
(Computation s,InpFs) . n is stable
let SCS be non-empty Circuit of non-empty ; for InpFs being InputFuncs of st commute InpFs is constant & not InputVertices IIG is empty holds
for s being State of
for n being Element of NAT st n = depth SCS holds
(Computation s,InpFs) . n is stable
let InpFs be InputFuncs of ; ( commute InpFs is constant & not InputVertices IIG is empty implies for s being State of
for n being Element of NAT st n = depth SCS holds
(Computation s,InpFs) . n is stable )
assume that
A1:
commute InpFs is constant
and
A2:
not InputVertices IIG is empty
; for s being State of
for n being Element of NAT st n = depth SCS holds
(Computation s,InpFs) . n is stable
A3:
dom (commute InpFs) = NAT
by A2, PRE_CIRC:8;
A4:
IIG is with_input_V
by A2, MSAFREE2:def 4;
then reconsider iv = (commute InpFs) . 0 as InputValues of SCS by CIRCUIT1:2;
let s be State of ; for n being Element of NAT st n = depth SCS holds
(Computation s,InpFs) . n is stable
let n be Element of NAT ; ( n = depth SCS implies (Computation s,InpFs) . n is stable )
assume A5:
n = depth SCS
; (Computation s,InpFs) . n is stable
reconsider Cn = (Computation s,InpFs) . n as State of ;
A6:
iv c= Cn
by A1, A2, Th14;
A7: (n + 1) -th_InputValues InpFs =
(commute InpFs) . (n + 1)
by A4, CIRCUIT1:def 2
.=
(commute InpFs) . 0
by A1, A3, FUNCT_1:def 16
;
reconsider Cn1 = (Computation s,InpFs) . (n + 1) as State of ;
hence (Computation s,InpFs) . n =
(Computation s,InpFs) . (n + 1)
by FUNCT_1:9
.=
Following Cn,((n + 1) -th_InputValues InpFs)
by Def9
.=
Following ((Computation s,InpFs) . n)
by A7, A6, FUNCT_4:79
;
CIRCUIT2:def 6 verum