let IIG be non empty finite non void Circuit-like monotonic ManySortedSign ; for SCS being non-empty Circuit of non-empty
for InpFs being InputFuncs of st commute InpFs is constant & not InputVertices IIG is empty holds
for s being State of
for iv being InputValues of SCS st iv = (commute InpFs) . 0 holds
for k being Element of NAT
for v being Vertex of st depth v,SCS <= k holds
((Computation s,InpFs) . k) . v = IGValue v,iv
let SCS be non-empty Circuit of non-empty ; for InpFs being InputFuncs of st commute InpFs is constant & not InputVertices IIG is empty holds
for s being State of
for iv being InputValues of SCS st iv = (commute InpFs) . 0 holds
for k being Element of NAT
for v being Vertex of st depth v,SCS <= k holds
((Computation s,InpFs) . k) . v = IGValue v,iv
let InpFs be InputFuncs of ; ( commute InpFs is constant & not InputVertices IIG is empty implies for s being State of
for iv being InputValues of SCS st iv = (commute InpFs) . 0 holds
for k being Element of NAT
for v being Vertex of st depth v,SCS <= k holds
((Computation s,InpFs) . k) . v = IGValue v,iv )
assume that
A1:
commute InpFs is constant
and
A2:
not InputVertices IIG is empty
; for s being State of
for iv being InputValues of SCS st iv = (commute InpFs) . 0 holds
for k being Element of NAT
for v being Vertex of st depth v,SCS <= k holds
((Computation s,InpFs) . k) . v = IGValue v,iv
let s be State of ; for iv being InputValues of SCS st iv = (commute InpFs) . 0 holds
for k being Element of NAT
for v being Vertex of st depth v,SCS <= k holds
((Computation s,InpFs) . k) . v = IGValue v,iv
let iv be InputValues of SCS; ( iv = (commute InpFs) . 0 implies for k being Element of NAT
for v being Vertex of st depth v,SCS <= k holds
((Computation s,InpFs) . k) . v = IGValue v,iv )
assume A3:
iv = (commute InpFs) . 0
; for k being Element of NAT
for v being Vertex of st depth v,SCS <= k holds
((Computation s,InpFs) . k) . v = IGValue v,iv
defpred S1[ Element of NAT ] means for v being Vertex of st depth v,SCS <= $1 holds
((Computation s,InpFs) . $1) . v = IGValue v,iv;
A4:
IIG is with_input_V
by A2, MSAFREE2:def 4;
A5:
S1[ 0 ]
A11:
for k being Element of NAT st S1[k] holds
S1[k + 1]
proof
let k be
Element of
NAT ;
( S1[k] implies S1[k + 1] )
reconsider Ck =
(Computation s,InpFs) . k as
State of ;
assume A12:
S1[
k]
;
S1[k + 1]
let v be
Vertex of ;
( depth v,SCS <= k + 1 implies ((Computation s,InpFs) . (k + 1)) . v = IGValue v,iv )
assume A13:
depth v,
SCS <= k + 1
;
((Computation s,InpFs) . (k + 1)) . v = IGValue v,iv
A14:
dom (commute InpFs) = NAT
by A2, PRE_CIRC:8;
A15:
(k + 1) -th_InputValues InpFs =
(commute InpFs) . (k + 1)
by A4, CIRCUIT1:def 2
.=
(commute InpFs) . 0
by A1, A14, FUNCT_1:def 16
;
A16:
iv c= Ck
by A1, A2, A3, Th14;
thus ((Computation s,InpFs) . (k + 1)) . v =
(Following Ck,((k + 1) -th_InputValues InpFs)) . v
by Def9
.=
(Following Ck) . v
by A3, A15, A16, FUNCT_4:79
.=
IGValue v,
iv
by A12, A13, Th13
;
verum
end;
thus
for k being Element of NAT holds S1[k]
from NAT_1:sch 1(A5, A11); verum