let C, D be Category; for c, c' being Object of
for d, d' being Object of holds Hom [c,d],[c',d'] = [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):]
let c, c' be Object of ; for d, d' being Object of holds Hom [c,d],[c',d'] = [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):]
let d, d' be Object of ; Hom [c,d],[c',d'] = [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):]
now let x be
set ;
( ( x in Hom [c,d],[c',d'] implies x in [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):] ) & ( x in [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):] implies x in Hom [c,d],[c',d'] ) )thus
(
x in Hom [c,d],
[c',d'] implies
x in [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):] )
( x in [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):] implies x in Hom [c,d],[c',d'] )proof
assume A1:
x in Hom [c,d],
[c',d']
;
x in [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):]
then reconsider fg =
x as
Morphism of
[c,d],
[c',d'] by CAT_1:def 7;
A2:
dom fg = [c,d]
by A1, CAT_1:18;
A3:
cod fg = [c',d']
by A1, CAT_1:18;
consider x1,
x2 being
set such that A4:
x1 in the
carrier' of
C
and A5:
x2 in the
carrier' of
D
and A6:
fg = [x1,x2]
by ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider g =
x2 as
Morphism of
by A5;
reconsider f =
x1 as
Morphism of
by A4;
A7:
cod fg = [(cod f),(cod g)]
by A6, Th38;
then A8:
cod f = c'
by A3, ZFMISC_1:33;
A9:
cod g = d'
by A3, A7, ZFMISC_1:33;
A10:
dom fg = [(dom f),(dom g)]
by A6, Th38;
then
dom g = d
by A2, ZFMISC_1:33;
then A11:
g in Hom d,
d'
by A9;
dom f = c
by A2, A10, ZFMISC_1:33;
then
f in Hom c,
c'
by A8;
hence
x in [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):]
by A6, A11, ZFMISC_1:106;
verum
end; assume
x in [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):]
;
x in Hom [c,d],[c',d']then consider x1,
x2 being
set such that A12:
x1 in Hom c,
c'
and A13:
x2 in Hom d,
d'
and A14:
x = [x1,x2]
by ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider g =
x2 as
Morphism of
d,
d' by A13, CAT_1:def 7;
reconsider f =
x1 as
Morphism of
c,
c' by A12, CAT_1:def 7;
(
cod f = c' &
cod g = d' )
by A12, A13, CAT_1:18;
then A15:
cod [f,g] = [c',d']
by Th38;
(
dom f = c &
dom g = d )
by A12, A13, CAT_1:18;
then
dom [f,g] = [c,d]
by Th38;
hence
x in Hom [c,d],
[c',d']
by A14, A15;
verum end;
hence
Hom [c,d],[c',d'] = [:(Hom c,c'),(Hom d,d'):]
by TARSKI:2; verum