let M be multMagma ; for R being Equivalence_Relation of holds
( R is compatible iff for v, v', w, w' being Element of st Class R,v = Class R,v' & Class R,w = Class R,w' holds
Class R,(v * w) = Class R,(v' * w') )
let R be Equivalence_Relation of ; ( R is compatible iff for v, v', w, w' being Element of st Class R,v = Class R,v' & Class R,w = Class R,w' holds
Class R,(v * w) = Class R,(v' * w') )
hereby ( ( for v, v', w, w' being Element of st Class R,v = Class R,v' & Class R,w = Class R,w' holds
Class R,(v * w) = Class R,(v' * w') ) implies R is compatible )
assume A1:
R is
compatible
;
for v, v', w, w' being Element of st Class R,v = Class R,v' & Class R,w = Class R,w' holds
Class R,(b5 * b7) = Class R,(b6 * b8)let v,
v',
w,
w' be
Element of ;
( Class R,v = Class R,v' & Class R,w = Class R,w' implies Class R,(b1 * b3) = Class R,(b2 * b4) )assume A2:
(
Class R,
v = Class R,
v' &
Class R,
w = Class R,
w' )
;
Class R,(b1 * b3) = Class R,(b2 * b4)
end;
assume A4:
for v, v', w, w' being Element of st Class R,v = Class R,v' & Class R,w = Class R,w' holds
Class R,(v * w) = Class R,(v' * w')
; R is compatible
for v, v', w, w' being Element of st v in Class R,v' & w in Class R,w' holds
v * w in Class R,(v' * w')
hence
R is compatible
by Def4; verum