let A, C be Ordinal; :: thesis: ( A <> {} & A is limit_ordinal implies for fi being Ordinal-Sequence st dom fi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp C,B ) holds
exp C,A is_limes_of fi )
assume that
A1:
A <> {}
and
A2:
A is limit_ordinal
; :: thesis: for fi being Ordinal-Sequence st dom fi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp C,B ) holds
exp C,A is_limes_of fi
consider psi being Ordinal-Sequence such that
A3:
dom psi = A
and
A4:
for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
psi . B = exp C,B
and
A5:
ex D being Ordinal st D is_limes_of psi
by A1, A2, Lm8;
let fi be Ordinal-Sequence; :: thesis: ( dom fi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp C,B ) implies exp C,A is_limes_of fi )
assume that
A6:
dom fi = A
and
A7:
for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp C,B
; :: thesis: exp C,A is_limes_of fi
then
fi = psi
by A6, A3, FUNCT_1:9;
then consider D being Ordinal such that
A9:
D is_limes_of fi
by A5;
D =
lim fi
by A9, ORDINAL2:def 14
.=
exp C,A
by A1, A2, A6, A7, ORDINAL2:62
;
hence
exp C,A is_limes_of fi
by A9; :: thesis: verum