let X be set ; :: thesis: for A being Subset-Family of X holds UniCl (UniCl A) = UniCl A
let A be Subset-Family of X; :: thesis: UniCl (UniCl A) = UniCl A
hereby :: according to TARSKI:def 3,
XBOOLE_0:def 10 :: thesis: UniCl A c= UniCl (UniCl A)
let x be
set ;
:: thesis: ( x in UniCl (UniCl A) implies x in UniCl A )assume
x in UniCl (UniCl A)
;
:: thesis: x in UniCl Athen consider Y being
Subset-Family of
X such that A1:
(
Y c= UniCl A &
x = union Y )
by CANTOR_1:def 1;
set Z =
{ y where y is Subset of X : ( y in A & y c= x ) } ;
{ y where y is Subset of X : ( y in A & y c= x ) } c= bool X
then reconsider Z =
{ y where y is Subset of X : ( y in A & y c= x ) } as
Subset-Family of
X ;
A2:
x = union Z
proof
hereby :: according to TARSKI:def 3,
XBOOLE_0:def 10 :: thesis: union Z c= x
let a be
set ;
:: thesis: ( a in x implies a in union Z )assume
a in x
;
:: thesis: a in union Zthen consider s being
set such that A3:
(
a in s &
s in Y )
by A1, TARSKI:def 4;
consider t being
Subset-Family of
X such that A4:
(
t c= A &
s = union t )
by A1, A3, CANTOR_1:def 1;
consider u being
set such that A5:
(
a in u &
u in t )
by A3, A4, TARSKI:def 4;
reconsider u =
u as
Subset of
X by A5;
(
u c= s &
s c= x )
by A1, A3, A4, A5, ZFMISC_1:92;
then
u c= x
by XBOOLE_1:1;
then
u in Z
by A4, A5;
hence
a in union Z
by A5, TARSKI:def 4;
:: thesis: verum
end;
let a be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not a in union Z or a in x )
assume
a in union Z
;
:: thesis: a in x
then consider u being
set such that A6:
(
a in u &
u in Z )
by TARSKI:def 4;
ex
y being
Subset of
X st
(
u = y &
y in A &
y c= x )
by A6;
hence
a in x
by A6;
:: thesis: verum
end;
Z c= A
hence
x in UniCl A
by A2, CANTOR_1:def 1;
:: thesis: verum
end;
thus
UniCl A c= UniCl (UniCl A)
by CANTOR_1:1; :: thesis: verum