let L be non empty Poset; :: thesis: ( L is completely-distributive iff L opp is completely-distributive )
thus
( L is completely-distributive implies L opp is completely-distributive )
:: thesis: ( L opp is completely-distributive implies L is completely-distributive )proof
assume
L is
completely-distributive
;
:: thesis: L opp is completely-distributive
then A1:
L is non
empty completely-distributive Poset
;
hence
L opp is
complete
;
:: according to WAYBEL_5:def 3 :: thesis: for b1 being set
for b2 being set
for b3 being ManySortedFunction of b2,b1 --> the carrier of (L opp ) holds //\ (\// b3,(L opp )),(L opp ) = \\/ (/\\ (Frege b3),(L opp )),(L opp )
let J be non
empty set ;
:: thesis: for b1 being set
for b2 being ManySortedFunction of b1,J --> the carrier of (L opp ) holds //\ (\// b2,(L opp )),(L opp ) = \\/ (/\\ (Frege b2),(L opp )),(L opp )let K be
V5()
ManySortedSet of ;
:: thesis: for b1 being ManySortedFunction of K,J --> the carrier of (L opp ) holds //\ (\// b1,(L opp )),(L opp ) = \\/ (/\\ (Frege b1),(L opp )),(L opp )let F be
DoubleIndexedSet of
K,
(L opp );
:: thesis: //\ (\// F,(L opp )),(L opp ) = \\/ (/\\ (Frege F),(L opp )),(L opp )
reconsider G =
F as
DoubleIndexedSet of
K,
L ;
thus Inf =
\\/ (Sups ),
L
by A1, Th49
.=
Sup
by A1, Th50
.=
Inf
by A1, Th48
.=
//\ (Infs ),
L
by A1, Th50
.=
Sup
by A1, Th49
;
:: thesis: verum
end;
assume
L opp is completely-distributive
; :: thesis: L is completely-distributive
then A2:
L opp is non empty completely-distributive Poset
;
then A3:
L is non empty complete Poset
by Th17;
thus
L is complete
by A2, Th17; :: according to WAYBEL_5:def 3 :: thesis: for b1 being set
for b2 being set
for b3 being ManySortedFunction of b2,b1 --> the carrier of L holds //\ (\// b3,L),L = \\/ (/\\ (Frege b3),L),L
let J be non empty set ; :: thesis: for b1 being set
for b2 being ManySortedFunction of b1,J --> the carrier of L holds //\ (\// b2,L),L = \\/ (/\\ (Frege b2),L),L
let K be V5() ManySortedSet of ; :: thesis: for b1 being ManySortedFunction of K,J --> the carrier of L holds //\ (\// b1,L),L = \\/ (/\\ (Frege b1),L),L
let F be DoubleIndexedSet of K,L; :: thesis: //\ (\// F,L),L = \\/ (/\\ (Frege F),L),L
reconsider G = F as DoubleIndexedSet of K,(L opp ) ;
thus Inf =
\\/ (Sups ),(L opp )
by A3, Th49
.=
Sup
by A3, Th50
.=
Inf
by A2, Th48
.=
//\ (Infs ),(L opp )
by A3, Th50
.=
Sup
by A3, Th49
; :: thesis: verum