let S, T be non empty lower-bounded up-complete Poset; :: thesis: ( [:S,T:] is continuous implies ( S is continuous & T is continuous ) )
assume that
A1:
for x being Element of [:S,T:] holds
( not waybelow x is empty & waybelow x is directed )
and
A2:
( [:S,T:] is up-complete & [:S,T:] is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation )
; :: according to WAYBEL_3:def 6 :: thesis: ( S is continuous & T is continuous )
hereby :: according to WAYBEL_3:def 6 :: thesis: T is continuous
thus
S is
up-complete
;
:: thesis: S is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation thus
S is
satisfying_axiom_of_approximation
:: thesis: verumproof
let s be
Element of
S;
:: according to WAYBEL_3:def 5 :: thesis: s = "\/" (waybelow s),S
consider t being
Element of
T;
waybelow [s,t] is
directed
by A1;
then
ex_sup_of waybelow [s,t],
[:S,T:]
by WAYBEL_0:75;
then A6:
sup (waybelow [s,t]) = [(sup (proj1 (waybelow [s,t]))),(sup (proj2 (waybelow [s,t])))]
by Th5;
thus s =
[s,t] `1
by MCART_1:7
.=
(sup (waybelow [s,t])) `1
by A2, WAYBEL_3:def 5
.=
sup (proj1 (waybelow [s,t]))
by A6, MCART_1:7
.=
sup (waybelow ([s,t] `1 ))
by Th46
.=
sup (waybelow s)
by MCART_1:7
;
:: thesis: verum
end;
end;
thus
T is up-complete
; :: thesis: T is satisfying_axiom_of_approximation
let t be Element of T; :: according to WAYBEL_3:def 5 :: thesis: t = "\/" (waybelow t),T
consider s being Element of S;
ex_sup_of waybelow [s,t],[:S,T:]
by A3;
then A9:
sup (waybelow [s,t]) = [(sup (proj1 (waybelow [s,t]))),(sup (proj2 (waybelow [s,t])))]
by Th5;
thus t =
[s,t] `2
by MCART_1:7
.=
(sup (waybelow [s,t])) `2
by A2, WAYBEL_3:def 5
.=
sup (proj2 (waybelow [s,t]))
by A9, MCART_1:7
.=
sup (waybelow ([s,t] `2 ))
by Th47
.=
sup (waybelow t)
by MCART_1:7
; :: thesis: verum