set N = L opp+id ;
thus L opp+id is antitone :: thesis: L opp+id is eventually-filtered
proof
A1: netmap (L opp+id ),L = id L by Def6;
A2: RelStr(# the carrier of (L opp+id ),the InternalRel of (L opp+id ) #) = RelStr(# the carrier of (L ~ ),the InternalRel of (L ~ ) #) by Th11;
reconsider f = id L as Function of (L ~ ),L ;
reconsider g = f as Function of L,(L ~ ) ;
A3: RelStr(# the carrier of L,the InternalRel of L #) = RelStr(# the carrier of L,the InternalRel of L #) ;
g is antitone by YELLOW_7:40;
then f is antitone by YELLOW_7:41;
hence netmap (L opp+id ),L is antitone by A1, A2, A3, Th2; :: according to WAYBEL_0:def 10 :: thesis: verum
end;
for i being Element of (L opp+id ) ex j being Element of (L opp+id ) st
for k being Element of (L opp+id ) st j <= k holds
(L opp+id ) . i >= (L opp+id ) . k
proof
let i be Element of (L opp+id ); :: thesis: ex j being Element of (L opp+id ) st
for k being Element of (L opp+id ) st j <= k holds
(L opp+id ) . i >= (L opp+id ) . k

take j = i; :: thesis: for k being Element of (L opp+id ) st j <= k holds
(L opp+id ) . i >= (L opp+id ) . k

let k be Element of (L opp+id ); :: thesis: ( j <= k implies (L opp+id ) . i >= (L opp+id ) . k )
assume A4: j <= k ; :: thesis: (L opp+id ) . i >= (L opp+id ) . k
reconsider i1 = i, k1 = k as Element of L by Def6;
A5: ( (id L) . i1 = i1 & (id L) . k1 = k1 ) by TMAP_1:91;
A6: the mapping of (L opp+id ) = id L by Def6;
A7: the InternalRel of (L opp+id ) = the InternalRel of L ~ by Def6;
[i,k] in the InternalRel of (L opp+id ) by A4, ORDERS_2:def 9;
then [k,i] in the InternalRel of (L opp+id ) ~ by RELAT_1:def 7;
hence (L opp+id ) . i >= (L opp+id ) . k by A5, A6, A7, ORDERS_2:def 9; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence L opp+id is eventually-filtered by WAYBEL_0:12; :: thesis: verum