let L be non empty Poset; :: thesis: for R being auxiliary(i) auxiliary(ii) Relation of L
for C being Subset of L st ( for c being Element of L holds ex_sup_of SetBelow R,C,c,L ) holds
SupBelow R,C is sup-closed
let R be auxiliary(i) auxiliary(ii) Relation of L; :: thesis: for C being Subset of L st ( for c being Element of L holds ex_sup_of SetBelow R,C,c,L ) holds
SupBelow R,C is sup-closed
let C be Subset of L; :: thesis: ( ( for c being Element of L holds ex_sup_of SetBelow R,C,c,L ) implies SupBelow R,C is sup-closed )
assume A1:
for c being Element of L holds ex_sup_of SetBelow R,C,c,L
; :: thesis: SupBelow R,C is sup-closed
let X be Subset of (SupBelow R,C); :: according to WAYBEL35:def 9 :: thesis: ( ex_sup_of X,L implies "\/" X,L = "\/" X,(subrelstr (SupBelow R,C)) )
set s = "\/" X,L;
A2:
the carrier of (subrelstr (SupBelow R,C)) = SupBelow R,C
by YELLOW_0:def 15;
assume A3:
ex_sup_of X,L
; :: thesis: "\/" X,L = "\/" X,(subrelstr (SupBelow R,C))
A4:
ex_sup_of SetBelow R,C,("\/" X,L),L
by A1;
SetBelow R,C,("\/" X,L) is_<=_than "\/" X,L
by Th19;
then A5:
sup (SetBelow R,C,("\/" X,L)) <= "\/" X,L
by A4, YELLOW_0:def 9;
X is_<=_than sup (SetBelow R,C,("\/" X,L))
proof
let x be
Element of
L;
:: according to LATTICE3:def 9 :: thesis: ( not x in X or x <= sup (SetBelow R,C,("\/" X,L)) )
assume A6:
x in X
;
:: thesis: x <= sup (SetBelow R,C,("\/" X,L))
then A7:
x = sup (SetBelow R,C,x)
by Def10;
A8:
ex_sup_of SetBelow R,
C,
x,
L
by A1;
SetBelow R,
C,
x c= SetBelow R,
C,
("\/" X,L)
by A3, A6, Th20, YELLOW_4:1;
hence
x <= sup (SetBelow R,C,("\/" X,L))
by A4, A7, A8, YELLOW_0:34;
:: thesis: verum
end;
then
"\/" X,L <= sup (SetBelow R,C,("\/" X,L))
by A3, YELLOW_0:def 9;
then
"\/" X,L = sup (SetBelow R,C,("\/" X,L))
by A5, ORDERS_2:25;
then A9:
"\/" X,L in SupBelow R,C
by Def10;
thus
"\/" X,L = "\/" X,(subrelstr (SupBelow R,C))
by A2, A3, A9, YELLOW_0:65; :: thesis: verum