let L be lower-bounded with_suprema Poset; :: thesis: for R being auxiliary(i) auxiliary(ii) Relation of L
for C being strict_chain of R st C is maximal & R is satisfying_SI holds
R satisfies_SIC_on C
let R be auxiliary(i) auxiliary(ii) Relation of L; :: thesis: for C being strict_chain of R st C is maximal & R is satisfying_SI holds
R satisfies_SIC_on C
let C be strict_chain of R; :: thesis: ( C is maximal & R is satisfying_SI implies R satisfies_SIC_on C )
assume that
A1:
C is maximal
and
A2:
R is satisfying_SI
; :: thesis: R satisfies_SIC_on C
let x, z be Element of L; :: according to WAYBEL35:def 6 :: thesis: ( x in C & z in C & [x,z] in R & x <> z implies ex y being Element of L st
( y in C & [x,y] in R & [y,z] in R & x <> y ) )
assume that
A3:
x in C
and
A4:
z in C
and
A5:
[x,z] in R
and
A6:
x <> z
; :: thesis: ex y being Element of L st
( y in C & [x,y] in R & [y,z] in R & x <> y )
assume A7:
for y being Element of L holds
( not y in C or not [x,y] in R or not [y,z] in R or not x <> y )
; :: thesis: contradiction
consider y being Element of L such that
A8:
[x,y] in R
and
A9:
[y,z] in R
and
A10:
x <> y
by A2, A5, A6, WAYBEL_4:def 21;
A11:
x <= y
by A8, WAYBEL_4:def 4;
A12:
y <= z
by A9, WAYBEL_4:def 4;
A13:
C c= C \/ {y}
by XBOOLE_1:7;
C \/ {y} is strict_chain of R
then
C \/ {y} = C
by A1, A13, Def4;
then
y in C
by ZFMISC_1:45;
hence
contradiction
by A7, A8, A9, A10; :: thesis: verum