let L1, L2, L3 be non empty transitive antisymmetric RelStr ; :: thesis: for f being Function of L1,L2 st f is monotone & f is directed-sups-preserving & L2 is full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of L3 & L3 is complete holds
ex g being Function of L1,L3 st
( f = g & g is directed-sups-preserving )
let f be Function of L1,L2; :: thesis: ( f is monotone & f is directed-sups-preserving & L2 is full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of L3 & L3 is complete implies ex g being Function of L1,L3 st
( f = g & g is directed-sups-preserving ) )
assume that
A1:
( f is monotone & f is directed-sups-preserving )
and
A2:
L2 is full directed-sups-inheriting SubRelStr of L3
and
A3:
L3 is complete
; :: thesis: ex g being Function of L1,L3 st
( f = g & g is directed-sups-preserving )
( not the carrier of L2 is empty & the carrier of L2 c= the carrier of L3 )
by A2, YELLOW_0:def 13;
then reconsider g = f as Function of L1,L3 by FUNCT_2:9;
take
g
; :: thesis: ( f = g & g is directed-sups-preserving )
thus
f = g
; :: thesis: g is directed-sups-preserving
now let X be
Subset of
L1;
:: thesis: ( not X is empty & X is directed implies g preserves_sup_of X )assume A4:
( not
X is
empty &
X is
directed )
;
:: thesis: g preserves_sup_of Xthen consider d being
set such that A5:
d in X
by XBOOLE_0:def 1;
( not the
carrier of
L2 is
empty &
d in the
carrier of
L1 )
by A5;
then
d in dom f
by FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
f . d in f .: X
by A5, FUNCT_1:def 12;
then A6:
( not
f .: X is
empty &
f .: X is
directed )
by A1, A4, YELLOW_2:17;
now assume A7:
ex_sup_of X,
L1
;
:: thesis: ( ex_sup_of g .: X,L3 & sup (g .: X) = g . (sup X) )A8:
f preserves_sup_of X
by A1, A4, WAYBEL_0:def 37;
thus
ex_sup_of g .: X,
L3
by A3, YELLOW_0:17;
:: thesis: sup (g .: X) = g . (sup X)hence sup (g .: X) =
sup (f .: X)
by A2, A6, WAYBEL_0:7
.=
g . (sup X)
by A7, A8, WAYBEL_0:def 31
;
:: thesis: verum end; hence
g preserves_sup_of X
by WAYBEL_0:def 31;
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
g is directed-sups-preserving
by WAYBEL_0:def 37; :: thesis: verum