now let y be
set ;
:: thesis: ( ( y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).] implies ex x being set st
( x in dom (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) & y = (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) . x ) ) & ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) & y = (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) . x ) implies y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).] ) )thus
(
y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).] implies ex
x being
set st
(
x in dom (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) &
y = (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) . x ) )
:: thesis: ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) & y = (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) . x ) implies y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).] )proof
assume A1:
y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).]
;
:: thesis: ex x being set st
( x in dom (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) & y = (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) . x )
then reconsider y1 =
y as
Real ;
A2:
- (PI / 2) <= - (PI / 4)
by Lm11, XXREAL_1:3;
[.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).] c= [.(- (PI / 2)),0 .[
by Lm11, XXREAL_2:def 12;
then A4:
cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).] is
continuous
by Th39, FCONT_1:17;
y1 in [.(cosec . (- (PI / 4))),(cosec . (- (PI / 2))).] \/ [.(cosec . (- (PI / 2))),(cosec . (- (PI / 4))).]
by A1, Th32, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then consider x being
Real such that A5:
x in [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]
and A6:
y1 = cosec . x
by A2, A4, X7, FCONT_2:16;
take
x
;
:: thesis: ( x in dom (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) & y = (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) . x )
thus
(
x in dom (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) &
y = (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) . x )
by A5, A6, Lm15, FUNCT_1:72;
:: thesis: verum
end; thus
( ex
x being
set st
(
x in dom (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) &
y = (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) . x ) implies
y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).] )
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
rng (cosec | [.(- (PI / 2)),(- (PI / 4)).]) = [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).]
by FUNCT_1:def 5; :: thesis: verum