now let y be
set ;
:: thesis: ( ( y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).] implies ex x being set st
( x in dom (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) & y = (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) . x ) ) & ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) & y = (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) . x ) implies y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).] ) )thus
(
y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).] implies ex
x being
set st
(
x in dom (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) &
y = (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) . x ) )
:: thesis: ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) & y = (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) . x ) implies y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).] )proof
assume A1:
y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).]
;
:: thesis: ex x being set st
( x in dom (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) & y = (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) . x )
then reconsider y1 =
y as
Real ;
A2:
(3 / 4) * PI <= PI
by Lm10, XXREAL_1:2;
[.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .] c= ].(PI / 2),PI .]
by Lm10, XXREAL_2:def 12;
then A4:
sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .] is
continuous
by Th38, FCONT_1:17;
y1 in [.(sec . ((3 / 4) * PI )),(sec . PI ).] \/ [.(sec . PI ),(sec . ((3 / 4) * PI )).]
by A1, Th31, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then consider x being
Real such that A5:
x in [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]
and A6:
y1 = sec . x
by A2, A4, X6, FCONT_2:16;
take
x
;
:: thesis: ( x in dom (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) & y = (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) . x )
thus
(
x in dom (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) &
y = (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) . x )
by A5, A6, Lm14, FUNCT_1:72;
:: thesis: verum
end; thus
( ex
x being
set st
(
x in dom (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) &
y = (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) . x ) implies
y in [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).] )
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
rng (sec | [.((3 / 4) * PI ),PI .]) = [.(- (sqrt 2)),(- 1).]
by FUNCT_1:def 5; :: thesis: verum