now let y be
set ;
:: thesis: ( ( y in [.(- 1),1.] implies ex x being set st
( x in dom (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) & y = (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) . x ) ) & ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) & y = (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) . x ) implies y in [.(- 1),1.] ) )thus
(
y in [.(- 1),1.] implies ex
x being
set st
(
x in dom (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) &
y = (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) . x ) )
:: thesis: ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) & y = (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) . x ) implies y in [.(- 1),1.] )proof
assume A1:
y in [.(- 1),1.]
;
:: thesis: ex x being set st
( x in dom (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) & y = (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) . x )
then reconsider y1 =
y as
Real ;
A2:
PI / 4
<= (3 / 4) * PI
A3:
cot | ].0 ,PI .[ is
continuous
by Lm2, FDIFF_1:33;
F:
[.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).] c= ].0 ,PI .[
by Lm9, Lm10, XXREAL_2:def 12;
A5:
cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).] is
continuous
by A3, F, FCONT_1:17;
Y:
[.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).] c= dom cot
by F, Th2, XBOOLE_1:1;
y1 in [.(cot . ((3 / 4) * PI )),(cot . (PI / 4)).] \/ [.(cot . (PI / 4)),(cot . ((3 / 4) * PI )).]
by A1, Th16, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then consider x being
Real such that A6:
x in [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]
and A7:
y1 = cot . x
by A2, A5, Y, FCONT_2:16;
take
x
;
:: thesis: ( x in dom (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) & y = (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) . x )
thus
(
x in dom (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) &
y = (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) . x )
by A6, A7, Lm12, FUNCT_1:72;
:: thesis: verum
end; thus
( ex
x being
set st
(
x in dom (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) &
y = (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) . x ) implies
y in [.(- 1),1.] )
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
rng (cot | [.(PI / 4),((3 / 4) * PI ).]) = [.(- 1),1.]
by FUNCT_1:def 5; :: thesis: verum