now let y be
set ;
:: thesis: ( ( y in [.(- 1),1.] implies ex x being set st
( x in dom (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) & y = (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) . x ) ) & ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) & y = (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) . x ) implies y in [.(- 1),1.] ) )thus
(
y in [.(- 1),1.] implies ex
x being
set st
(
x in dom (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) &
y = (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) . x ) )
:: thesis: ( ex x being set st
( x in dom (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) & y = (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) . x ) implies y in [.(- 1),1.] )proof
assume A1:
y in [.(- 1),1.]
;
:: thesis: ex x being set st
( x in dom (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) & y = (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) . x )
then reconsider y1 =
y as
Real ;
A2:
tan | ].(- (PI / 2)),(PI / 2).[ is
continuous
by Lm1, FDIFF_1:33;
F:
[.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).] c= ].(- (PI / 2)),(PI / 2).[
by Lm7, Lm8, XXREAL_2:def 12;
Y:
[.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).] c= dom tan
by Th1, F, XBOOLE_1:1;
A4:
tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).] is
continuous
by A2, F, FCONT_1:17;
y1 in [.(tan . (- (PI / 4))),(tan . (PI / 4)).]
by A1, Th15, SIN_COS:def 32;
then
y1 in [.(tan . (- (PI / 4))),(tan . (PI / 4)).] \/ [.(tan . (PI / 4)),(tan . (- (PI / 4))).]
by XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then consider x being
Real such that A5:
x in [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]
and A6:
y1 = tan . x
by A4, Y, FCONT_2:16;
take
x
;
:: thesis: ( x in dom (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) & y = (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) . x )
thus
(
x in dom (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) &
y = (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) . x )
by A5, A6, Lm11, FUNCT_1:72;
:: thesis: verum
end; thus
( ex
x being
set st
(
x in dom (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) &
y = (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) . x ) implies
y in [.(- 1),1.] )
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
rng (tan | [.(- (PI / 4)),(PI / 4).]) = [.(- 1),1.]
by FUNCT_1:def 5; :: thesis: verum