let th be real number ; :: thesis: ( th in ].0 ,(PI / 2).[ implies cos . th > 0 )
assume A1:
( th in ].0 ,(PI / 2).[ & cos . th <= 0 )
; :: thesis: contradiction
cos | REAL is continuous
by Th72, FDIFF_1:33;
then A2:
cos | [.0 ,th.] is continuous
by FCONT_1:17;
A3:
0 < th
by A1, XXREAL_1:4;
A4:
th is Real
by XREAL_0:def 1;
A5:
[.(cos . 0 ),(cos . th).] \/ [.(cos . th),(cos . 0 ).] = [.(cos . th),(cos . 0 ).]
by A1, Th33, XXREAL_1:222;
0 in [.(cos . th),(cos . 0 ).]
by A1, Th33, XXREAL_1:1;
then
ex th2 being Real st
( th2 in [.0 ,th.] & cos . th2 = 0 )
by A2, A3, A4, A5, Th27, FCONT_2:16;
then consider th2 being Real such that
A6:
( th2 in [.0 ,th.] & 0 < th & cos . th2 = 0 )
by A3;
A7:
( 0 <= th2 & th2 <= th & th < PI / 2 )
by A1, A6, XXREAL_1:1, XXREAL_1:4;
then
( 0 < th2 & th2 < PI / 2 )
by A6, Th33, XXREAL_0:2;
then A8:
( 0 / 2 < th2 / 2 & th2 / 2 < (PI / 2) / 2 )
by XREAL_1:76;
PI in ].0 ,4.[
by Def32;
then
( 0 < PI & PI < 4 )
by XXREAL_1:4;
then
PI / 4 < 4 / 4
by XREAL_1:76;
then A9:
( 0 < th2 / 2 & th2 / 2 < 1 )
by A8, XXREAL_0:2;
0 =
cos . ((th2 / 2) + (th2 / 2))
by A6
.=
((cos . (th2 / 2)) ^2 ) - ((sin . (th2 / 2)) * (sin . (th2 / 2)))
by Th79
.=
((cos . (th2 / 2)) - (sin . (th2 / 2))) * ((cos . (th2 / 2)) + (sin . (th2 / 2)))
;
then B10:
( (cos . (th2 / 2)) - (sin . (th2 / 2)) = 0 or (cos . (th2 / 2)) + (sin . (th2 / 2)) = 0 )
;
A11:
th2 / 2 in ].0 ,1.[
by A9, XXREAL_1:4;
A12:
].0 ,1.[ c= [.0 ,1.]
by XXREAL_1:25;
then A13:
cos . (th2 / 2) > 0
by A11, Th74;
A14:
sin . (th2 / 2) >= - 0
by A11, A12, Lm22;
( 2 * th2 in ].0 ,4.[ & tan . ((2 * th2) / 4) = 1 )
then
2 * th2 = PI
by Def32;
hence
contradiction
by A7; :: thesis: verum