let a, b be Int-Location ; :: thesis: (product" (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)))) . 2 = SCM+FSA-Data-Loc
A1: InsCode (Divide a,b) = 5 by SCMFSA_2:46;
dom (product" (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)))) = {1,2} by Th35, SCMFSA_2:46;
then A2: 2 in dom (product" (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)))) by TARSKI:def 2;

hereby :: according to TARSKI:def 3,XBOOLE_0:def 10 :: thesis: SCM+FSA-Data-Loc c= (product" (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)))) . 2

let x be set ; :: thesis: ( x in (product" (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)))) . 2 implies x in SCM+FSA-Data-Loc )
assume x in (product" (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)))) . 2 ; :: thesis: x in SCM+FSA-Data-Loc
then x in pi (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b))),2 by A2, CARD_3:def 13;
then consider f being Function such that
A3: f in AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)) and
A4: f . 2 = x by CARD_3:def 6;
consider I being Instruction of SCM+FSA such that
A5: f = AddressPart I and
A6: InsCode I = InsCode (Divide a,b) by A3;
InsCode I = 5 by A6, SCMFSA_2:46;
then consider d1, d2 being Int-Location such that
A7: I = Divide d1,d2 by SCMFSA_2:58;
x = <*d1,d2*> . 2 by A4, A5, A7, Th22
.= d2 by FINSEQ_1:61 ;
hence x in SCM+FSA-Data-Loc by SCMFSA_2:def 4; :: thesis: verum

end;

let x be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in SCM+FSA-Data-Loc or x in (product" (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)))) . 2 )
assume x in SCM+FSA-Data-Loc ; :: thesis: x in (product" (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)))) . 2
then reconsider x = x as Int-Location by SCMFSA_2:28;
InsCode (Divide a,x) = 5 by SCMFSA_2:46;
then AddressPart (Divide a,x) in AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)) by A1;
then A8: (AddressPart (Divide a,x)) . 2 in pi (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b))),2 by CARD_3:def 6;
(AddressPart (Divide a,x)) . 2 = <*a,x*> . 2 by Th22
.= x by FINSEQ_1:61 ;
hence x in (product" (AddressParts (InsCode (Divide a,b)))) . 2 by A2, A8, CARD_3:def 13; :: thesis: verum