let p be Real; :: thesis: ( 0< p & p < 1 implies for r, s being Real st r in X & s in X & (p * r)+((1 - p)* s)in X & r <> s holds (f + g).((p * r)+((1 - p)* s))<(p *((f + g). r))+((1 - p)*((f + g). s)) ) assume A4:
( 0< p & p < 1 )
; :: thesis: for r, s being Real st r in X & s in X & (p * r)+((1 - p)* s)in X & r <> s holds (f + g).((p * r)+((1 - p)* s))<(p *((f + g). r))+((1 - p)*((f + g). s))
for r, s being Real st r in X & s in X & (p * r)+((1 - p)* s)in X & r <> s holds (f + g).((p * r)+((1 - p)* s))<(p *((f + g). r))+((1 - p)*((f + g). s))
hence
for r, s being Real st r in X & s in X & (p * r)+((1 - p)* s)in X & r <> s holds (f + g).((p * r)+((1 - p)* s))<(p *((f + g). r))+((1 - p)*((f + g). s))
; :: thesis: verum