let f be real-valued Function; :: thesis: ( f is bounded iff ex r being real number st
for c being set st c in dom f holds
abs (f . c) <= r )

thus ( f is bounded implies ex r being real number st
for c being set st c in dom f holds
abs (f . c) <= r ) :: thesis: ( ex r being real number st
for c being set st c in dom f holds
abs (f . c) <= r implies f is bounded )
proof
assume A1: f is bounded ; :: thesis: ex r being real number st
for c being set st c in dom f holds
abs (f . c) <= r

then consider r1 being real number such that
A2: for c being set st c in dom f holds
f . c < r1 by SEQ_2:def 1;
consider r2 being real number such that
A3: for c being set st c in dom f holds
r2 < f . c by A1, SEQ_2:def 2;
take g = (abs r1) + (abs r2); :: thesis: for c being set st c in dom f holds
abs (f . c) <= g

let c be set ; :: thesis: ( c in dom f implies abs (f . c) <= g )
assume A4: c in dom f ; :: thesis: abs (f . c) <= g
A5: 0 <= abs r1 by COMPLEX1:132;
A6: 0 <= abs r2 by COMPLEX1:132;
A7: r1 <= abs r1 by ABSVALUE:11;
f . c <= abs r1 by A7, A2, A4, XXREAL_0:2;
then A8: (f . c) + 0 <= (abs r1) + (abs r2) by A6, XREAL_1:9;
A9: - (abs r2) <= r2 by ABSVALUE:11;
- (abs r2) <= f . c by A9, A3, A4, XXREAL_0:2;
then A11: (- (abs r1)) + (- (abs r2)) <= 0 + (f . c) by A5, XREAL_1:9;
(- (abs r1)) + (- (abs r2)) = - g ;
hence abs (f . c) <= g by A8, A11, ABSVALUE:12; :: thesis: verum
end;
given r being real number such that A12: for c being set st c in dom f holds
abs (f . c) <= r ; :: thesis: f is bounded
thus f is bounded_above :: according to SEQ_2:def 8 :: thesis: f is bounded_below
proof
take r + 1 ; :: according to SEQ_2:def 1 :: thesis: for b1 being set holds
( not b1 in dom f or not r + 1 <= f . b1 )

let c be set ; :: thesis: ( not c in dom f or not r + 1 <= f . c )
assume c in dom f ; :: thesis: not r + 1 <= f . c
then A13: abs (f . c) < r + 1 by A12, XREAL_1:41;
f . c <= abs (f . c) by ABSVALUE:11;
hence not r + 1 <= f . c by A13, XXREAL_0:2; :: thesis: verum
end;
take - (r + 1) ; :: according to SEQ_2:def 2 :: thesis: for b1 being set holds
( not b1 in dom f or not f . b1 <= - (r + 1) )

let c be set ; :: thesis: ( not c in dom f or not f . c <= - (r + 1) )
assume c in dom f ; :: thesis: not f . c <= - (r + 1)
then abs (f . c) < r + 1 by A12, XREAL_1:41;
then A15: - (r + 1) < - (abs (f . c)) by XREAL_1:26;
- (abs (f . c)) <= f . c by ABSVALUE:11;
hence not f . c <= - (r + 1) by A15, XXREAL_0:2; :: thesis: verum