let E be set ; :: thesis: for S being semi-Thue-system of E holds ==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega ))) = (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega ))
let S be semi-Thue-system of E; :: thesis: ==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega ))) = (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega ))
A1:
==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega ))) c= (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega ))
proof
let x be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in ==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega ))) or x in (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega )) )
assume A2:
x in ==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega )))
;
:: thesis: x in (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega ))
then consider a,
b being
set such that A3:
(
a in E ^omega &
b in E ^omega &
x = [a,b] )
by ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider a =
a,
b =
b as
Element of
E ^omega by A3;
a ==>. b,
S \/ (id (E ^omega ))
by A2, A3, Def6;
then consider v,
w,
s1,
t1 being
Element of
E ^omega such that A4:
(
a = (v ^ s1) ^ w &
b = (v ^ t1) ^ w &
s1 -->. t1,
S \/ (id (E ^omega )) )
by Def5;
A5:
[s1,t1] in S \/ (id (E ^omega ))
by A4, Def4;
end;
(==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega )) c= ==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega )))
hence
==>.-relation (S \/ (id (E ^omega ))) = (==>.-relation S) \/ (id (E ^omega ))
by A1, XBOOLE_0:def 10; :: thesis: verum