let c, d be Element of ((k - 1) -chain-space p); :: thesis: ( ( (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty implies c = 0. ((k - 1) -chain-space p) ) & ( not (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty implies for x being Element of (k - 1) -polytopes p holds
( x in c iff Sum (incidence-sequence x,v) = 1. Z_2 ) ) & ( (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty implies d = 0. ((k - 1) -chain-space p) ) & ( not (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty implies for x being Element of (k - 1) -polytopes p holds
( x in d iff Sum (incidence-sequence x,v) = 1. Z_2 ) ) implies c = d )

assume that
A4: ( (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty implies c = 0. ((k - 1) -chain-space p) ) and
A5: ( not (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty implies for x being Element of (k - 1) -polytopes p holds
( x in c iff Sum (incidence-sequence x,v) = 1. Z_2 ) ) and
( (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty implies d = 0. ((k - 1) -chain-space p) ) and
A7: ( not (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty implies for x being Element of (k - 1) -polytopes p holds
( x in d iff Sum (incidence-sequence x,v) = 1. Z_2 ) ) ; :: thesis: c = d
per cases ( (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty or not (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty ) ;
suppose (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty ; :: thesis: c = d
hence c = d by A4; :: thesis: verum
end;
suppose A8: not (k - 1) -polytopes p is empty ; :: thesis: c = d
for x being Element of (k - 1) -polytopes p holds
( x in c iff x in d )
proof
let x be Element of (k - 1) -polytopes p; :: thesis: ( x in c iff x in d )
thus ( x in c implies x in d ) :: thesis: ( x in d implies x in c )
proof
assume x in c ; :: thesis: x in d
then Sum (incidence-sequence x,v) = 1. Z_2 by A5;
hence x in d by A7, A8; :: thesis: verum
end;
thus ( x in d implies x in c ) :: thesis: verum
proof
assume x in d ; :: thesis: x in c
then Sum (incidence-sequence x,v) = 1. Z_2 by A7;
hence x in c by A5, A8; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;
hence c = d by Th45; :: thesis: verum
end;
end;