let Y be non empty set ; :: thesis: for PA being a_partition of Y
for X0, X1 being Subset of Y st X0 is_a_dependent_set_of PA & X1 is_a_dependent_set_of PA & X0 meets X1 holds
X0 /\ X1 is_a_dependent_set_of PA
let PA be a_partition of Y; :: thesis: for X0, X1 being Subset of Y st X0 is_a_dependent_set_of PA & X1 is_a_dependent_set_of PA & X0 meets X1 holds
X0 /\ X1 is_a_dependent_set_of PA
let X0, X1 be Subset of Y; :: thesis: ( X0 is_a_dependent_set_of PA & X1 is_a_dependent_set_of PA & X0 meets X1 implies X0 /\ X1 is_a_dependent_set_of PA )
assume A1:
( X0 is_a_dependent_set_of PA & X1 is_a_dependent_set_of PA & X0 meets X1 )
; :: thesis: X0 /\ X1 is_a_dependent_set_of PA
then consider A being set such that
A2:
( A c= PA & A <> {} & X0 = union A )
by Def1;
consider B being set such that
A3:
( B c= PA & B <> {} & X1 = union B )
by A1, Def1;
A4:
X0 /\ X1 = union (A /\ B)
proof
A5:
X0 /\ X1 c= union (A /\ B)
proof
let x be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in X0 /\ X1 or x in union (A /\ B) )
assume
x in X0 /\ X1
;
:: thesis: x in union (A /\ B)
then A6:
(
x in X0 &
x in X1 )
by XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then consider y being
set such that A7:
(
x in y &
y in A )
by A2, TARSKI:def 4;
consider z being
set such that A8:
(
x in z &
z in B )
by A3, A6, TARSKI:def 4;
A9:
y in PA
by A2, A7;
A10:
z in PA
by A3, A8;
y meets z
by A7, A8, XBOOLE_0:3;
then
y = z
by A9, A10, EQREL_1:def 6;
then
y in A /\ B
by A7, A8, XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence
x in union (A /\ B)
by A7, TARSKI:def 4;
:: thesis: verum
end;
union (A /\ B) c= X0 /\ X1
hence
X0 /\ X1 = union (A /\ B)
by A5, XBOOLE_0:def 10;
:: thesis: verum
end;
A12:
A \/ B c= PA
by A2, A3, XBOOLE_1:8;
A13:
A /\ B c= A
by XBOOLE_1:17;
A c= A \/ B
by XBOOLE_1:7;
then
A /\ B c= A \/ B
by A13, XBOOLE_1:1;
then A14:
A /\ B c= PA
by A12, XBOOLE_1:1;
hence
X0 /\ X1 is_a_dependent_set_of PA
by A4, A14, Def1; :: thesis: verum