let OAS be OAffinSpace; :: thesis: ( OAS is satisfying_DES_1 implies OAS is satisfying_DES )
assume A1: OAS is satisfying_DES_1 ; :: thesis: OAS is satisfying_DES
for o, a, b, c, a1, b1, c1 being Element of OAS st o,a // o,a1 & o,b // o,b1 & o,c // o,c1 & not LIN o,a,b & not LIN o,a,c & a,b // a1,b1 & a,c // a1,c1 holds
b,c // b1,c1
proof
let o, a, b, c, a1, b1, c1 be Element of OAS; :: thesis: ( o,a // o,a1 & o,b // o,b1 & o,c // o,c1 & not LIN o,a,b & not LIN o,a,c & a,b // a1,b1 & a,c // a1,c1 implies b,c // b1,c1 )
assume that
A2: ( o,a // o,a1 & o,b // o,b1 & o,c // o,c1 ) and
A3: ( not LIN o,a,b & not LIN o,a,c ) and
A4: ( a,b // a1,b1 & a,c // a1,c1 ) ; :: thesis: b,c // b1,c1
consider a2 being Element of OAS such that
A5: Mid a,o,a2 and
A6: o <> a2 by DIRAF:17;
A7: ( o <> a & o <> b & o <> c & a <> b & a <> c ) by A3, DIRAF:37;
A8: a,o // o,a2 by A5, DIRAF:def 3;
then consider b2 being Element of OAS such that
A9: b,o // o,b2 and
A10: b,a // a2,b2 by A7, ANALOAF:def 5;
consider c2 being Element of OAS such that
A11: c,o // o,c2 and
A12: c,a // a2,c2 by A7, A8, ANALOAF:def 5;
( a,b // b2,a2 & a,c // c2,a2 ) by A10, A12, ANALOAF:def 5;
then A13: b,c // c2,b2 by A1, A3, A8, A9, A11, Def16;
A14: ( a2,o // o,a & b2,o // o,b & c2,o // o,c ) by A8, A9, A11, DIRAF:5;
then A15: ( a2,o // o,a1 & b2,o // o,b1 & c2,o // o,c1 ) by A2, A7, DIRAF:6;
( b2,a2 // a,b & c2,a2 // a,c ) by A10, A12, DIRAF:5;
then ( b2,a2 // a1,b1 & c2,a2 // a1,c1 ) by A4, A7, DIRAF:6;
then A16: ( a2,c2 // c1,a1 & a2,b2 // b1,a1 ) by DIRAF:5;
LIN a,o,a2 by A5, DIRAF:34;
then A17: LIN o,a2,a by DIRAF:36;
( Mid b2,o,b & Mid c2,o,c ) by A14, DIRAF:def 3;
then A18: ( LIN b2,o,b & LIN c2,o,c ) by DIRAF:34;
A19: o <> b2
proof
assume o = b2 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then o,a2 // a,b by A10, DIRAF:5;
then o,a2 '||' a,b by DIRAF:def 4;
then ( LIN o,a2,o & LIN o,a2,b ) by A6, A17, DIRAF:37, DIRAF:39;
hence contradiction by A3, A6, A17, DIRAF:38; :: thesis: verum
end;
A20: not LIN o,a2,b2
proof
assume A21: LIN o,a2,b2 ; :: thesis: contradiction
LIN o,a2,o by DIRAF:37;
then A22: LIN b2,o,a by A6, A17, A21, DIRAF:38;
LIN b2,o,o by DIRAF:37;
hence contradiction by A3, A18, A19, A22, DIRAF:38; :: thesis: verum
end;
A23: o <> c2
proof
assume o = c2 ; :: thesis: contradiction
then o,a2 // a,c by A12, DIRAF:5;
then o,a2 '||' a,c by DIRAF:def 4;
then ( LIN o,a2,o & LIN o,a2,c ) by A6, A17, DIRAF:37, DIRAF:39;
hence contradiction by A3, A6, A17, DIRAF:38; :: thesis: verum
end;
not LIN o,a2,c2
proof
assume A24: LIN o,a2,c2 ; :: thesis: contradiction
LIN o,a2,o by DIRAF:37;
then A25: LIN c2,o,a by A6, A17, A24, DIRAF:38;
LIN c2,o,o by DIRAF:37;
hence contradiction by A3, A18, A23, A25, DIRAF:38; :: thesis: verum
end;
then A26: c2,b2 // b1,c1 by A1, A15, A16, A20, Def16;
now
assume A27: c2 = b2 ; :: thesis: b,c // b1,c1
A28: not LIN o,b2,a2 by A20, DIRAF:36;
A29: ( LIN o,b2,b & LIN o,b2,c ) by A18, A27, DIRAF:36;
( b2,a2 // a,b & c2,a2 // a,c ) by A10, A12, DIRAF:5;
then ( b2,a2 '||' a,b & b2,a2 '||' a,c ) by A27, DIRAF:def 4;
then b = c by A17, A28, A29, PASCH:11;
hence b,c // b1,c1 by DIRAF:7; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence b,c // b1,c1 by A13, A26, DIRAF:6; :: thesis: verum
end;
hence OAS is satisfying_DES by Def15; :: thesis: verum