let A, C be Ordinal; :: thesis: ( A <> {} & A is limit_ordinal implies for fi being Ordinal-Sequence st dom fi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp C,B ) holds
exp C,A is_limes_of fi )
assume A1:
( A <> {} & A is limit_ordinal )
; :: thesis: for fi being Ordinal-Sequence st dom fi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp C,B ) holds
exp C,A is_limes_of fi
let fi be Ordinal-Sequence; :: thesis: ( dom fi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp C,B ) implies exp C,A is_limes_of fi )
assume A2:
( dom fi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
fi . B = exp C,B ) )
; :: thesis: exp C,A is_limes_of fi
consider psi being Ordinal-Sequence such that
A3:
( dom psi = A & ( for B being Ordinal st B in A holds
psi . B = exp C,B ) )
and
A4:
ex D being Ordinal st D is_limes_of psi
by A1, Lm8;
then
fi = psi
by A2, A3, FUNCT_1:9;
then consider D being Ordinal such that
A6:
D is_limes_of fi
by A4;
D =
lim fi
by A6, ORDINAL2:def 14
.=
exp C,A
by A1, A2, ORDINAL2:62
;
hence
exp C,A is_limes_of fi
by A6; :: thesis: verum