let fi be Ordinal-Sequence; :: thesis: for A being Ordinal
for f1, f2 being Ordinal-Sequence st dom f1 = dom fi & dom fi = dom f2 & A is_limes_of f1 & A is_limes_of f2 & ( for A being Ordinal st A in dom fi holds
( f1 . A c= fi . A & fi . A c= f2 . A ) ) holds
A is_limes_of fi
let A be Ordinal; :: thesis: for f1, f2 being Ordinal-Sequence st dom f1 = dom fi & dom fi = dom f2 & A is_limes_of f1 & A is_limes_of f2 & ( for A being Ordinal st A in dom fi holds
( f1 . A c= fi . A & fi . A c= f2 . A ) ) holds
A is_limes_of fi
let f1, f2 be Ordinal-Sequence; :: thesis: ( dom f1 = dom fi & dom fi = dom f2 & A is_limes_of f1 & A is_limes_of f2 & ( for A being Ordinal st A in dom fi holds
( f1 . A c= fi . A & fi . A c= f2 . A ) ) implies A is_limes_of fi )
assume that
A1:
( dom f1 = dom fi & dom fi = dom f2 )
and
A2:
( ( A = {} & ex B being Ordinal st
( B in dom f1 & ( for C being Ordinal st B c= C & C in dom f1 holds
f1 . C = {} ) ) ) or ( A <> {} & ( for B, C being Ordinal st B in A & A in C holds
ex D being Ordinal st
( D in dom f1 & ( for E being Ordinal st D c= E & E in dom f1 holds
( B in f1 . E & f1 . E in C ) ) ) ) ) )
and
A3:
( ( A = {} & ex B being Ordinal st
( B in dom f2 & ( for C being Ordinal st B c= C & C in dom f2 holds
f2 . C = {} ) ) ) or ( A <> {} & ( for B, C being Ordinal st B in A & A in C holds
ex D being Ordinal st
( D in dom f2 & ( for E being Ordinal st D c= E & E in dom f2 holds
( B in f2 . E & f2 . E in C ) ) ) ) ) )
and
A4:
for A being Ordinal st A in dom fi holds
( f1 . A c= fi . A & fi . A c= f2 . A )
; :: according to ORDINAL2:def 13 :: thesis: A is_limes_of fi
per cases
( A = {} or A <> {} )
;
:: according to ORDINAL2:def 13case
A <> {}
;
:: thesis: for b1, b2 being set holds
( not b1 in A or not A in b2 or ex b3 being set st
( b3 in dom fi & ( for b4 being set holds
( not b3 c= b4 or not b4 in dom fi or ( b1 in fi . b4 & fi . b4 in b2 ) ) ) ) )let B,
C be
Ordinal;
:: thesis: ( not B in A or not A in C or ex b1 being set st
( b1 in dom fi & ( for b2 being set holds
( not b1 c= b2 or not b2 in dom fi or ( B in fi . b2 & fi . b2 in C ) ) ) ) )assume A6:
(
B in A &
A in C )
;
:: thesis: ex b1 being set st
( b1 in dom fi & ( for b2 being set holds
( not b1 c= b2 or not b2 in dom fi or ( B in fi . b2 & fi . b2 in C ) ) ) )then consider D1 being
Ordinal such that A7:
(
D1 in dom f1 & ( for
A1 being
Ordinal st
D1 c= A1 &
A1 in dom f1 holds
(
B in f1 . A1 &
f1 . A1 in C ) ) )
by A2;
consider D2 being
Ordinal such that A8:
(
D2 in dom f2 & ( for
A1 being
Ordinal st
D2 c= A1 &
A1 in dom f2 holds
(
B in f2 . A1 &
f2 . A1 in C ) ) )
by A3, A6;
take D =
D1 \/ D2;
:: thesis: ( D in dom fi & ( for b1 being set holds
( not D c= b1 or not b1 in dom fi or ( B in fi . b1 & fi . b1 in C ) ) ) )thus
D in dom fi
by A1, A7, A8, ORDINAL3:15;
:: thesis: for b1 being set holds
( not D c= b1 or not b1 in dom fi or ( B in fi . b1 & fi . b1 in C ) )let A1 be
Ordinal;
:: thesis: ( not D c= A1 or not A1 in dom fi or ( B in fi . A1 & fi . A1 in C ) )assume A9:
(
D c= A1 &
A1 in dom fi )
;
:: thesis: ( B in fi . A1 & fi . A1 in C )reconsider B1 =
fi . A1,
B2 =
f2 . A1 as
Ordinal ;
(
D1 c= D &
D2 c= D )
by XBOOLE_1:7;
then
(
D1 c= A1 &
D2 c= A1 )
by A9, XBOOLE_1:1;
then
(
B in f1 . A1 &
f1 . A1 c= fi . A1 &
B1 c= B2 &
B2 in C )
by A1, A4, A7, A8, A9;
hence
(
B in fi . A1 &
fi . A1 in C )
by ORDINAL1:22;
:: thesis: verum end; end;