let fi, psi be Ordinal-Sequence; :: thesis: for C being Ordinal st {} <> dom fi & dom fi = dom psi & C <> {} & sup fi is limit_ordinal & ( for A, B being Ordinal st A in dom fi & B = fi . A holds
psi . A = B *^ C ) holds
sup psi = (sup fi) *^ C
let C be Ordinal; :: thesis: ( {} <> dom fi & dom fi = dom psi & C <> {} & sup fi is limit_ordinal & ( for A, B being Ordinal st A in dom fi & B = fi . A holds
psi . A = B *^ C ) implies sup psi = (sup fi) *^ C )
assume that
{} <> dom fi
and
A1:
dom fi = dom psi
and
A2:
C <> {}
and
A3:
sup fi is limit_ordinal
and
A4:
for A, B being Ordinal st A in dom fi & B = fi . A holds
psi . A = B *^ C
; :: thesis: sup psi = (sup fi) *^ C
A5:
sup (rng psi) c= (sup (rng fi)) *^ C
(sup (rng fi)) *^ C c= sup (rng psi)
proof
let x be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in (sup (rng fi)) *^ C or x in sup (rng psi) )
assume A10:
x in (sup (rng fi)) *^ C
;
:: thesis: x in sup (rng psi)
then reconsider A =
x as
Ordinal ;
consider B being
Ordinal such that A11:
(
B in sup (rng fi) &
A in B *^ C )
by A3, A10, Th49;
consider D being
Ordinal such that A12:
(
D in rng fi &
B c= D )
by A11, ORDINAL2:29;
consider y being
set such that A13:
(
y in dom fi &
D = fi . y )
by A12, FUNCT_1:def 5;
reconsider y =
y as
Ordinal by A13;
reconsider y' =
psi . y as
Ordinal ;
(
y' in rng psi &
y' = D *^ C )
by A1, A4, A13, FUNCT_1:def 5;
then
(
D *^ C in sup (rng psi) &
B *^ C c= D *^ C )
by A12, ORDINAL2:27, ORDINAL2:58;
hence
x in sup (rng psi)
by A11, ORDINAL1:19;
:: thesis: verum
end;
hence
sup psi = (sup fi) *^ C
by A5, XBOOLE_0:def 10; :: thesis: verum