let C, A, B be Ordinal; :: thesis: ( C <> {} & A in B implies A *^ C in B *^ C )
assume A1:
C <> {}
; :: thesis: ( not A in B or A *^ C in B *^ C )
{} c= C
;
then B2:
{} c< C
by A1, XBOOLE_0:def 8;
then A2:
{} in C
by ORDINAL1:21;
defpred S1[ Ordinal] means ( A in $1 implies A *^ C in $1 *^ C );
A3:
for B being Ordinal st ( for D being Ordinal st D in B holds
S1[D] ) holds
S1[B]
proof
let B be
Ordinal;
:: thesis: ( ( for D being Ordinal st D in B holds
S1[D] ) implies S1[B] )
assume that A4:
for
D being
Ordinal st
D in B &
A in D holds
A *^ C in D *^ C
and A5:
A in B
;
:: thesis: A *^ C in B *^ C
now assume
for
D being
Ordinal holds
B <> succ D
;
:: thesis: A *^ C in B *^ Cthen A11:
B is
limit_ordinal
by ORDINAL1:42;
deffunc H1(
Ordinal)
-> Ordinal = $1
*^ C;
consider fi being
Ordinal-Sequence such that A12:
(
dom fi = B & ( for
D being
Ordinal st
D in B holds
fi . D = H1(
D) ) )
from ORDINAL2:sch 3();
A13:
B *^ C =
union (sup fi)
by A5, A11, A12, Th54
.=
union (sup (rng fi))
;
A14:
succ A in B
by A5, A11, ORDINAL1:41;
then
fi . (succ A) = (succ A) *^ C
by A12;
then
(succ A) *^ C in rng fi
by A12, A14, FUNCT_1:def 5;
then A15:
(succ A) *^ C c= union (sup (rng fi))
by Th27, ZFMISC_1:92;
(
(A *^ C) +^ {} = A *^ C &
(A *^ C) +^ {} in (A *^ C) +^ C &
(succ A) *^ C = (A *^ C) +^ C )
by B2, Th44, Th49, Th53, ORDINAL1:21;
hence
A *^ C in B *^ C
by A13, A15;
:: thesis: verum end;
hence
A *^ C in B *^ C
by A6;
:: thesis: verum
end;
for B being Ordinal holds S1[B]
from ORDINAL1:sch 2(A3);
hence
( not A in B or A *^ C in B *^ C )
; :: thesis: verum