let A1, A2 be Ordinal; :: thesis: ( A1 is_limes_of fi & A2 is_limes_of fi implies A1 = A2 )
assume that
A2:
( ( A1 = {} & ex B being Ordinal st
( B in dom fi & ( for C being Ordinal st B c= C & C in dom fi holds
fi . C = {} ) ) ) or ( A1 <> {} & ( for B, C being Ordinal st B in A1 & A1 in C holds
ex D being Ordinal st
( D in dom fi & ( for E being Ordinal st D c= E & E in dom fi holds
( B in fi . E & fi . E in C ) ) ) ) ) )
and
A3:
( ( A2 = {} & ex B being Ordinal st
( B in dom fi & ( for C being Ordinal st B c= C & C in dom fi holds
fi . C = {} ) ) ) or ( A2 <> {} & ( for B, C being Ordinal st B in A2 & A2 in C holds
ex D being Ordinal st
( D in dom fi & ( for E being Ordinal st D c= E & E in dom fi holds
( B in fi . E & fi . E in C ) ) ) ) ) )
; :: according to ORDINAL2:def 13 :: thesis: A1 = A2
assume A4:
A1 <> A2
; :: thesis: contradiction
then A5:
( A1 in A2 or A2 in A1 )
by ORDINAL1:24;
then
( A1 in succ A1 & A1 <> {} )
by A4, ORDINAL1:10, ORDINAL1:24;
then consider D being Ordinal such that
A18:
D in dom fi
and
A19:
for A being Ordinal st D c= A & A in dom fi holds
( A2 in fi . A & fi . A in succ A1 )
by A2, A5, A6;
consider x being Element of A2;
reconsider x = x as Ordinal ;
consider C being Ordinal such that
A24:
C in dom fi
and
A25:
for A being Ordinal st C c= A & A in dom fi holds
( x in fi . A & fi . A in succ A2 )
by A3, A20, ORDINAL1:10;
( C c= D or D c= C )
;
then consider E being Ordinal such that
A26:
( ( E = D & C c= D ) or ( E = C & D c= C ) )
;
A27:
( fi . E in succ A2 & A2 in fi . E )
by A18, A19, A24, A25, A26;
then
( fi . E in A2 or fi . E = A2 )
by ORDINAL1:13;
hence
contradiction
by A27; :: thesis: verum