let L be FinSequence; :: thesis: for H, F being LTL-formula
for W, W1 being Subset of (Subformulae H) st rng L = Subformulae H & L is one-to-one & not F in W & W1 = W \/ {F} holds
len L,W1 = (len L,W) + (len F)
let H, F be LTL-formula; :: thesis: for W, W1 being Subset of (Subformulae H) st rng L = Subformulae H & L is one-to-one & not F in W & W1 = W \/ {F} holds
len L,W1 = (len L,W) + (len F)
let W, W1 be Subset of (Subformulae H); :: thesis: ( rng L = Subformulae H & L is one-to-one & not F in W & W1 = W \/ {F} implies len L,W1 = (len L,W) + (len F) )
assume that
A1:
( rng L = Subformulae H & L is one-to-one )
and
A2:
not F in W
and
A3:
W1 = W \/ {F}
; :: thesis: len L,W1 = (len L,W) + (len F)
F in {F}
by TARSKI:def 1;
then A4:
F in W1
by A3, XBOOLE_0:def 3;
W1 \ {F} = W
then
len L,W = (len L,W1) - (len F)
by Thlen02, A1, A4;
hence
len L,W1 = (len L,W) + (len F)
; :: thesis: verum