let k be real number ; :: thesis: for X being non empty set
for S being SigmaField of X
for E being Element of S
for f being PartFunc of X,REAL st f is nonnegative & 0 <= k & E c= dom f & f is_measurable_on E holds
f to_power k is_measurable_on E
let X be non empty set ; :: thesis: for S being SigmaField of X
for E being Element of S
for f being PartFunc of X,REAL st f is nonnegative & 0 <= k & E c= dom f & f is_measurable_on E holds
f to_power k is_measurable_on E
let S be SigmaField of X; :: thesis: for E being Element of S
for f being PartFunc of X,REAL st f is nonnegative & 0 <= k & E c= dom f & f is_measurable_on E holds
f to_power k is_measurable_on E
let E be Element of S; :: thesis: for f being PartFunc of X,REAL st f is nonnegative & 0 <= k & E c= dom f & f is_measurable_on E holds
f to_power k is_measurable_on E
let f be PartFunc of X,REAL ; :: thesis: ( f is nonnegative & 0 <= k & E c= dom f & f is_measurable_on E implies f to_power k is_measurable_on E )
reconsider k1 = k as Real by XREAL_0:def 1;
assume that
A1:
f is nonnegative
and
B1:
0 <= k
and
A2:
( E c= dom f & f is_measurable_on E )
; :: thesis: f to_power k is_measurable_on E
A3:
dom (f to_power k) = dom f
by Def7;
per cases
( k = 0 or k > 0 )
by B1;
suppose B11:
k = 0
;
:: thesis: f to_power k is_measurable_on EA8:
E c= dom (f to_power k)
by A2, Def7;
now let r be
real number ;
:: thesis: E /\ (less_dom (f to_power k),b1) in Sreconsider r1 =
r as
Real by XREAL_0:def 1;
per cases
( r <= 1 or 1 < r )
;
suppose A11:
r <= 1
;
:: thesis: E /\ (less_dom (f to_power k),b1) in Snow let x be
set ;
:: thesis: ( x in E implies x in great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r1 )assume A12:
x in E
;
:: thesis: x in great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r1then
(f to_power k) . x = (f . x) to_power k
by A2, A3, Def7;
then
r <= (f to_power k) . x
by B11, A11, POWER:29;
hence
x in great_eq_dom (f to_power k),
r1
by A2, A3, A12, MESFUNC6:6;
:: thesis: verum end; then
E c= great_eq_dom (f to_power k),
r
by TARSKI:def 3;
then
E /\ (great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r) = E
by XBOOLE_1:28;
then
E /\ (less_dom (f to_power k),r1) = E \ E
by A8, MES121;
hence
E /\ (less_dom (f to_power k),r) in S
;
:: thesis: verum end; suppose A6:
1
< r
;
:: thesis: E /\ (less_dom (f to_power k),b1) in Snow let x be
set ;
:: thesis: ( x in E implies x in less_dom (f to_power k),r )assume A7:
x in E
;
:: thesis: x in less_dom (f to_power k),rthen
(f to_power k) . x = (f . x) to_power k
by A2, A3, Def7;
then
(f to_power k) . x < r
by B11, A6, POWER:29;
hence
x in less_dom (f to_power k),
r
by A2, A3, A7, MESFUNC6:3;
:: thesis: verum end; then
E c= less_dom (f to_power k),
r
by TARSKI:def 3;
then
E /\ (less_dom (f to_power k),r) = E
by XBOOLE_1:28;
hence
E /\ (less_dom (f to_power k),r) in S
;
:: thesis: verum end; end; end; hence
f to_power k is_measurable_on E
by MESFUNC6:12;
:: thesis: verum end; suppose B12:
k > 0
;
:: thesis: f to_power k is_measurable_on E
for
r being
real number holds
E /\ (great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r) in S
proof
let r be
real number ;
:: thesis: E /\ (great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r) in S
reconsider r1 =
r as
Real by XREAL_0:def 1;
per cases
( r1 <= 0 or 0 < r1 )
;
suppose A15:
0 < r1
;
:: thesis: E /\ (great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r) in SA16:
now let x be
set ;
:: thesis: ( x in great_eq_dom f,(r1 to_power (1 / k)) implies x in great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r1 )assume A17:
x in great_eq_dom f,
(r1 to_power (1 / k))
;
:: thesis: x in great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r1then A10:
x in dom (f to_power k)
by A3, MESFUNC6:6;
A20:
ex
y being
Real st
(
y = f . x &
r1 to_power (1 / k) <= y )
by A17, MESFUNC6:6;
A24:
0 < r to_power (1 / k)
by A15, POWER:39;
set R =
r to_power (1 / k);
(r to_power (1 / k)) to_power k = r to_power ((1 / k) * k)
by A15, POWER:38;
then
(r to_power (1 / k)) to_power k = r to_power 1
by B12, XCMPLX_1:88;
then
r1 to_power 1
<= (f . x) to_power k1
by B12, A20, A24, HOLDER_1:3;
then
r <= (f . x) to_power k
by POWER:30;
then
r <= (f to_power k) . x
by A10, Def7;
hence
x in great_eq_dom (f to_power k),
r1
by A10, MESFUNC6:6;
:: thesis: verum end; now let x be
set ;
:: thesis: ( x in great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r1 implies x in great_eq_dom f,(r1 to_power (1 / k)) )assume A26:
x in great_eq_dom (f to_power k),
r1
;
:: thesis: x in great_eq_dom f,(r1 to_power (1 / k))then A27:
x in dom (f to_power k)
by MESFUNC6:6;
A29:
0 <= f . x
by A1, MESFUNC6:51;
ex
y2 being
Real st
(
y2 = (f to_power k) . x &
r1 <= y2 )
by A26, MESFUNC6:6;
then
r <= (f . x) to_power k
by A27, Def7;
then A33:
r to_power (1 / k1) <= ((f . x) to_power k1) to_power (1 / k1)
by A15, B12, HOLDER_1:3;
((f . x) to_power k1) to_power (1 / k1) = (f . x) to_power ((k1 * 1) / k1)
by B12, A29, HOLDER_1:2;
then
((f . x) to_power k1) to_power (1 / k1) = (f . x) to_power 1
by B12, XCMPLX_1:88;
then
((f . x) to_power k) to_power (1 / k) = f . x
by POWER:30;
hence
x in great_eq_dom f,
(r1 to_power (1 / k))
by A3, A27, A33, MESFUNC6:6;
:: thesis: verum end; then
E /\ (great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r1) = E /\ (great_eq_dom f,(r1 to_power (1 / k)))
by A16, TARSKI:2;
hence
E /\ (great_eq_dom (f to_power k),r) in S
by A2, MESFUNC6:13;
:: thesis: verum end; end;
end; hence
f to_power k is_measurable_on E
by A2, A3, MESFUNC6:13;
:: thesis: verum end; end;