let r, x0 be Real; :: thesis: ( 0 < r implies ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0} = ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[ )
assume A1:
0 < r
; :: thesis: ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0} = ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[
thus
].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0} c= ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[
:: according to XBOOLE_0:def 10 :: thesis: ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[ c= ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0}proof
let x be
set ;
:: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0} or x in ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[ )
assume A2:
x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0}
;
:: thesis: x in ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[
then A3:
(
x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ & not
x in {x0} )
by XBOOLE_0:def 5;
consider r1 being
Real such that A4:
r1 = x
by A2;
A5:
r1 <> x0
by A3, A4, TARSKI:def 1;
x in { g2 where g2 is Real : ( x0 - r < g2 & g2 < x0 + r ) }
by A3, RCOMP_1:def 2;
then A6:
ex
g2 being
Real st
(
g2 = x &
x0 - r < g2 &
g2 < x0 + r )
;
hence
x in ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[
;
:: thesis: verum
end;
let x be set ; :: according to TARSKI:def 3 :: thesis: ( not x in ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[ or x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0} )
assume A7:
x in ].(x0 - r),x0.[ \/ ].x0,(x0 + r).[
; :: thesis: x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0}
hence
x in ].(x0 - r),(x0 + r).[ \ {x0}
; :: thesis: verum