thus
( f is_less_than g iff for x being Element of X
for y being Element of Y holds f . x,y <= g . x,y )
:: thesis: verumproof
hereby :: thesis: ( ( for x being Element of X
for y being Element of Y holds f . x,y <= g . x,y ) implies f is_less_than g )
assume A1:
f is_less_than g
;
:: thesis: for x being Element of X
for y being Element of Y holds f . x,y <= g . x,ythus
for
x being
Element of
X for
y being
Element of
Y holds
f . x,
y <= g . x,
y
:: thesis: verumproof
let x be
Element of
X;
:: thesis: for y being Element of Y holds f . x,y <= g . x,ylet y be
Element of
Y;
:: thesis: f . x,y <= g . x,y
(
dom f = [:X,Y:] &
[x,y] in [:X,Y:] )
by FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence
f . x,
y <= g . x,
y
by A1, FUZZY_1:def 2;
:: thesis: verum
end;
end;
assume A2:
for
x being
Element of
X for
y being
Element of
Y holds
f . x,
y <= g . x,
y
;
:: thesis: f is_less_than g
A3:
(
dom f = [:X,Y:] &
dom g = [:X,Y:] )
by FUNCT_2:def 1;
for
c being
set st
c in dom f holds
f . c <= g . c
hence
f is_less_than g
by A3, FUZZY_1:def 2;
:: thesis: verum
end;