let h be non constant standard special_circular_sequence; :: thesis: n_e_n h <> n_e_s h
set i1 = n_e_n h;
set i2 = n_e_s h;
A1: ( n_e_n h <= (n_e_n h) + 1 & n_e_s h <= (n_e_s h) + 1 ) by NAT_1:11;
A2: ( 1 <= n_e_n h & (n_e_n h) + 1 <= len h & 1 <= n_e_s h & (n_e_s h) + 1 <= len h ) by Def14, Def16;
then ( n_e_n h <= len h & n_e_s h <= len h ) by A1, XXREAL_0:2;
then A3: ( n_e_n h in dom h & n_e_s h in dom h ) by A2, FINSEQ_3:27;
A4: h . (n_e_n h) = N-max (L~ h) by Def16;
A5: h . (n_e_s h) = S-max (L~ h) by Def14;
A6: ( h . (n_e_n h) = h /. (n_e_n h) & h . (n_e_s h) = h /. (n_e_s h) ) by A3, PARTFUN1:def 8;
thus n_e_n h <> n_e_s h :: thesis: verum
proof
assume n_e_n h = n_e_s h ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A7: N-bound (L~ h) = (h /. (n_e_s h)) `2 by A4, A6, EUCLID:56
.= S-bound (L~ h) by A5, A6, EUCLID:56 ;
1 <= len h by GOBOARD7:36, XXREAL_0:2;
then ( (h /. 1) `2 <= N-bound (L~ h) & (h /. 1) `2 >= S-bound (L~ h) ) by Th13;
then A8: (h /. 1) `2 = N-bound (L~ h) by A7, XXREAL_0:1;
consider ii being Element of NAT such that
A9: ( ii in dom h & (h /. ii) `2 <> (h /. 1) `2 ) by GOBOARD7:33;
A10: ( 1 <= ii & ii <= len h ) by A9, FINSEQ_3:27;
then A11: (h /. ii) `2 <= N-bound (L~ h) by Th13;
(h /. ii) `2 >= S-bound (L~ h) by A10, Th13;
hence contradiction by A7, A8, A9, A11, XXREAL_0:1; :: thesis: verum
end;