let h be non constant standard special_circular_sequence; :: thesis: n_s_w h <> n_s_e h
set i1 = n_s_w h;
set i2 = n_s_e h;
A1: ( n_s_w h <= (n_s_w h) + 1 & n_s_e h <= (n_s_e h) + 1 ) by NAT_1:11;
A2: ( 1 <= n_s_w h & (n_s_w h) + 1 <= len h & 1 <= n_s_e h & (n_s_e h) + 1 <= len h ) by Def9, Def11;
then ( n_s_w h <= len h & n_s_e h <= len h ) by A1, XXREAL_0:2;
then A3: ( n_s_w h in dom h & n_s_e h in dom h ) by A2, FINSEQ_3:27;
A4: h . (n_s_w h) = W-min (L~ h) by Def9;
A5: h . (n_s_e h) = E-min (L~ h) by Def11;
A6: ( h . (n_s_w h) = h /. (n_s_w h) & h . (n_s_e h) = h /. (n_s_e h) ) by A3, PARTFUN1:def 8;
thus n_s_w h <> n_s_e h :: thesis: verum
proof
assume n_s_w h = n_s_e h ; :: thesis: contradiction
then A7: W-bound (L~ h) = (h /. (n_s_e h)) `1 by A4, A6, EUCLID:56
.= E-bound (L~ h) by A5, A6, EUCLID:56 ;
1 <= len h by GOBOARD7:36, XXREAL_0:2;
then ( (h /. 1) `1 <= E-bound (L~ h) & (h /. 1) `1 >= W-bound (L~ h) ) by Th14;
then A8: (h /. 1) `1 = W-bound (L~ h) by A7, XXREAL_0:1;
consider ii being Element of NAT such that
A9: ( ii in dom h & (h /. ii) `1 <> (h /. 1) `1 ) by GOBOARD7:32;
A10: ( 1 <= ii & ii <= len h ) by A9, FINSEQ_3:27;
then A11: (h /. ii) `1 <= E-bound (L~ h) by Th14;
(h /. ii) `1 >= W-bound (L~ h) by A10, Th14;
hence contradiction by A7, A8, A9, A11, XXREAL_0:1; :: thesis: verum
end;